<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Man Booker Prize</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2008-man-booker-prize/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews</link>
	<description>Book reviews of contemporary literary fiction and modern classics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:33:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2008-man-booker-prize/comment-page-1/#comment-3142</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?page_id=546#comment-3142</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious about what people think of the jury&#039;s all white, almost all British list.  I&#039;m one who hopes the book&#039;s merits are the deciding factor though I&#039;m also one who knows that there are &lt;em&gt;always&lt;/em&gt; good books from a variety of authors, so there&#039;s never a need for this type of list -- or is there this year?  Did anyone really want Adiga back on the list with &lt;em&gt;Between the Assassinations&lt;/em&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious about what people think of the jury&#8217;s all white, almost all British list.  I&#8217;m one who hopes the book&#8217;s merits are the deciding factor though I&#8217;m also one who knows that there are <em>always</em> good books from a variety of authors, so there&#8217;s never a need for this type of list &#8212; or is there this year?  Did anyone really want Adiga back on the list with <em>Between the Assassinations</em>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2008-man-booker-prize/comment-page-1/#comment-3141</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?page_id=546#comment-3141</guid>
		<description>I have to say I like the list, for the most part.  I&#039;m really not interested (yet) in &lt;em&gt;Me Cheeta&lt;/em&gt;, and I don&#039;t think I&#039;ll read it unless I start to feel I&#039;m missing something.  Also, from what I&#039;ve heard about it, I&#039;m not interested in &lt;em&gt;Not Untrue &amp; Not Unkind&lt;/em&gt;.  

However, &lt;em&gt;The Quickening Maze&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;The Wilderness&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;Brooklyn&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;The Children&#039;s Book&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;The Glass Room&lt;/em&gt; are all books I&#039;ve been wanting to read for a while now.  I&#039;m also interested in &lt;em&gt;Wolf Hall&lt;/em&gt;, though I&#039;m a bit sceptical.  Also, I&#039;ll give &lt;em&gt;The Little Stranger&lt;/em&gt; a shot and go into with low expectations.  &lt;em&gt;Heliopolis&lt;/em&gt; is a surprise to me, but I&#039;m intrigued.  And, of course, we have Coetzee and Trevor (I&#039;m reading &lt;em&gt;Foe&lt;/em&gt; right now, and I&#039;ve always found I like Coetzee&#039;s stuff -- Trevor I&#039;m a bit more wary off because what I&#039;ve read in &lt;em&gt;The New Yorker&lt;/em&gt; hasn&#039;t been my cup of tea).

Okay, happy Booker season to everyone.  I hope it pays off better this year than last.  I already think it will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say I like the list, for the most part.  I&#8217;m really not interested (yet) in <em>Me Cheeta</em>, and I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ll read it unless I start to feel I&#8217;m missing something.  Also, from what I&#8217;ve heard about it, I&#8217;m not interested in <em>Not Untrue &#038; Not Unkind</em>.  </p>
<p>However, <em>The Quickening Maze</em>, <em>The Wilderness</em>, <em>Brooklyn</em>, <em>The Children&#8217;s Book</em>, <em>The Glass Room</em> are all books I&#8217;ve been wanting to read for a while now.  I&#8217;m also interested in <em>Wolf Hall</em>, though I&#8217;m a bit sceptical.  Also, I&#8217;ll give <em>The Little Stranger</em> a shot and go into with low expectations.  <em>Heliopolis</em> is a surprise to me, but I&#8217;m intrigued.  And, of course, we have Coetzee and Trevor (I&#8217;m reading <em>Foe</em> right now, and I&#8217;ve always found I like Coetzee&#8217;s stuff &#8212; Trevor I&#8217;m a bit more wary off because what I&#8217;ve read in <em>The New Yorker</em> hasn&#8217;t been my cup of tea).</p>
<p>Okay, happy Booker season to everyone.  I hope it pays off better this year than last.  I already think it will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2008-man-booker-prize/comment-page-1/#comment-3134</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 22:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?page_id=546#comment-3134</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure you don&#039;t need me to tell you, but tomorrow, Tuesday, July 28, the shortlist is going to be announced.  

I won&#039;t be here when it does because I&#039;m getting up early to take the New York bar exam (wish me luck!), but I&#039;m anxious to see what is selected tomorrow night when I get back to my hotel room thoroughly exhausted.  The bar exam runs on Wednesday too, so I&#039;ll be late jumping in the fray -- and I&#039;m still not sure how much I&#039;ll participate this year.  I don&#039;t start working at my firm until mid-September, and while you&#039;d think that means I&#039;ll have plenty of time to read, I read on my commute.  It&#039;s a thousand times harder to read when there&#039;s plenty of time to spend with family.  We&#039;ll see though!  One thing&#039;s for certain, the book reviews&#039; schedule is getting tightly packed, so there&#039;ll be no shortage of those even if I don&#039;t join the longlist challenge this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure you don&#8217;t need me to tell you, but tomorrow, Tuesday, July 28, the shortlist is going to be announced.  </p>
<p>I won&#8217;t be here when it does because I&#8217;m getting up early to take the New York bar exam (wish me luck!), but I&#8217;m anxious to see what is selected tomorrow night when I get back to my hotel room thoroughly exhausted.  The bar exam runs on Wednesday too, so I&#8217;ll be late jumping in the fray &#8212; and I&#8217;m still not sure how much I&#8217;ll participate this year.  I don&#8217;t start working at my firm until mid-September, and while you&#8217;d think that means I&#8217;ll have plenty of time to read, I read on my commute.  It&#8217;s a thousand times harder to read when there&#8217;s plenty of time to spend with family.  We&#8217;ll see though!  One thing&#8217;s for certain, the book reviews&#8217; schedule is getting tightly packed, so there&#8217;ll be no shortage of those even if I don&#8217;t join the longlist challenge this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colette Jones</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2008-man-booker-prize/comment-page-1/#comment-2810</link>
		<dc:creator>Colette Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 23:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?page_id=546#comment-2810</guid>
		<description>I would definitely say you should read them in order.  The first to make you care, the second to make you cry, and the third because you still care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would definitely say you should read them in order.  The first to make you care, the second to make you cry, and the third because you still care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KevinfromCanada</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2008-man-booker-prize/comment-page-1/#comment-2806</link>
		<dc:creator>KevinfromCanada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?page_id=546#comment-2806</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;August, I&#039;ll Go To Bed At Noon&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Curious Earth&lt;/i&gt;.  The blogging world as well as Colette seems to feel that &lt;i&gt;I&#039;ll Go To Bed At Noon&lt;/i&gt; is be far the best, &lt;i&gt;August&lt;/i&gt; quite good, the concluding book not that good.  They also say they don&#039;t have to be read in order but given my interest in the &quot;reportage&quot; aspect of books reading them in order is what appeals to me -- the three go from the 60s to the 70s to the 80s and that is a particularly interesting period in British history.  Even if the main theme is a family story, I usually find that kind of context spread over three volumes interesting.  And since Colette took her nom-de-web from the trilogy I know it must be good. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>August, I&#8217;ll Go To Bed At Noon</i> and <i>Curious Earth</i>.  The blogging world as well as Colette seems to feel that <i>I&#8217;ll Go To Bed At Noon</i> is be far the best, <i>August</i> quite good, the concluding book not that good.  They also say they don&#8217;t have to be read in order but given my interest in the &#8220;reportage&#8221; aspect of books reading them in order is what appeals to me &#8212; the three go from the 60s to the 70s to the 80s and that is a particularly interesting period in British history.  Even if the main theme is a family story, I usually find that kind of context spread over three volumes interesting.  And since Colette took her nom-de-web from the trilogy I know it must be good. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2008-man-booker-prize/comment-page-1/#comment-2805</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?page_id=546#comment-2805</guid>
		<description>What makes up that &quot;trilogy&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What makes up that &#8220;trilogy&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colette Jones</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2008-man-booker-prize/comment-page-1/#comment-2804</link>
		<dc:creator>Colette Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?page_id=546#comment-2804</guid>
		<description>Oh dear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh dear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KevinfromCanada</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2008-man-booker-prize/comment-page-1/#comment-2803</link>
		<dc:creator>KevinfromCanada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?page_id=546#comment-2803</guid>
		<description>I do have that trilogy on the wishlist for the next order and it is all because of your webname, Colette.  You have been warned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do have that trilogy on the wishlist for the next order and it is all because of your webname, Colette.  You have been warned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colette Jones</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2008-man-booker-prize/comment-page-1/#comment-2802</link>
		<dc:creator>Colette Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?page_id=546#comment-2802</guid>
		<description>I would have to agree that 2004 was a great year for the Booker even though I have only read 3 of the shortlist, not including the winner.  However, I have the other 3 and want to read them.  I&#039;ll Go To Bed At Noon (you might not be surprised to hear) is my favourite so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have to agree that 2004 was a great year for the Booker even though I have only read 3 of the shortlist, not including the winner.  However, I have the other 3 and want to read them.  I&#8217;ll Go To Bed At Noon (you might not be surprised to hear) is my favourite so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2008-man-booker-prize/comment-page-1/#comment-2801</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?page_id=546#comment-2801</guid>
		<description>I definitely like the personal element you add to the definition, Kevin.  That is definitely one reason why 2004 was so memorable to me.  I think I&#039;ve explained that somewhere on here already, so I&#039;ll refrain.  Last year will be very memorable for me also because it was the first year I seriously engaged with the longlist &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; with so many other readers on this and other blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely like the personal element you add to the definition, Kevin.  That is definitely one reason why 2004 was so memorable to me.  I think I&#8217;ve explained that somewhere on here already, so I&#8217;ll refrain.  Last year will be very memorable for me also because it was the first year I seriously engaged with the longlist <em>and</em> with so many other readers on this and other blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

