Review Index

Contact:

Email me at mookseandgripes [at] gmail [dot] com

Follow me @mookse

Transparency Statement

If the book reviewed was sent to me for free by the publisher, I have indicated as much in a caption under the book's cover image.

For a detailed explanation of my review policy, click here.

The New Yorker Fiction Forum

New Yorker Original Cover

Click here to see what's happening in the fiction of each issue of The New Yorker.

Last Five Issues: ____________________________

2012 Book Awards

  • National Book Critics Circle Award
    • Winner: Edith Pearlman's Binocular Vision
  • The Story Prize
  • PEN/Faulkner Award
    • Winner: Julie Otsuka's The Buddha in the Attic
  • Hemingway Foundation/PEN Award
    • Winner: Teju Cole: Open City
  • Pulitzer Prize
    • Winner: No award given
  • Best Translated Book Award
    • Winner: Wieslaw Mysliwski: Stone Upon Stone
  • Orange Prize
    • Winner: May 30, 2012
  • International IMPAC Dublin Literary Award
    • Winner: June 13, 2012
  • Man Booker Prize
    • Winner: October
  • Nobel Prize in Literature
    • Winner: October
  • Giller Prize
    • Shadow Winner: Early November
    • Winner: Early November
  • National Book Award
    • Winner: November
____________________________

2011 Book Awards

  • The Story Prize
    • Winner: Anthony Doerr's Memory Wall
  • PEN/Faulkner Award
    • Winner: Deborah Eisenberg's The Collected Stories of Deborah Eisenberg
  • Hemingway Foundation/PEN Award
    • Winner: Brando Skyhorse: The Madonnas of Echo Park
  • International IMPAC Dublin Literary Award
    • Winner: Colum McCann's Let the Great World Spin
  • Nobel Prize in Literature
    • Winner: Tomas Tranströmer
  • National Book Award
    • Winner: Jesmyn Ward's Salvage the Bones
____________________________

2010 Book Awards

  • National Book Critics Circle Award
    • Winner: Hilary Mantel's Wolf Hall
  • The Story Prize
    • Winner: Daniyal Mueenuddin's In Other Rooms, Other Wonders
  • PEN/Faulkner Award
    • Winner: Sherman Alexie's War Dances
  • Hemingway Foundation/PEN Award
    • Winner: Brigid Pasulka's A Long, Long Time Ago and Essentially True
  • Pulitzer Prize
  • Orange Prize
    • Winner: Barbara Kingsolver's The Lacuna
  • International IMPAC Dublin Literary Award
  • Nobel Prize in Literature
    • Winner: Mario Vargas Llosa
____________________________

2009 Book Awards

  • National Book Critics Circle Award
    • Winner: Roberto Bolano's 2666
  • PEN/Faulkner Award
  • Hemingway Foundation/PEN Award
    • Winner: Michael Dahlie's A Gentleman's Guide to Graceful Living
  • Best Translated Book Award
    • Winner: Attila Bartis: Tranquility
  • Orange Prize
    • Winner: Marilynne Robinson's Home
  • International IMPAC Dublin Literary Award
    • Winner: Michael Thomas's Man Gone Down
  • Man Booker Prize
    • Winner: Hilary Mantel's Wolf Hall
  • Nobel Prize in Literature
    • Winner: Herta Müller
  • National Book Award
    • Winner: Colum McCann's Let the Great World Spin

Barry Unsworth: Sacred Hunger

Before you read the book:

One day I printed out a list of all Booker Prize winners and went hunting for them at the local bookstore.  I love Amazon, but it’s not the same as seeing the books and holding their weight.  Sacred Hunger (1996), a fairly massive co-winner, stood out.  I was in the mood for an expansive book.  And the cover’s anthropological theme also appealed.  It just felt important.

In what should have been a more recognized year of anniversary: 200 years since the importation of slaves was prohibited in America in 1808 (201 years since the vote to abolish the slave trade in England in 1807, though last year England did have some significant events to commemorate, even a movie which my wife liked but I have yet to see: Amazing Grace).  If only much of the horror had truly ended then – probably the reason the date slipped past with little fanfare. Nevertheless, I celebrated the anniversary by reading Sacred Hunger.  Unsworth’s book offers some bitter insight into why the horrors didn’t stop. It’s definitely a moral indignation novel, though not quite like others.  I didn’t feel indicted by its content, but many passages left me broken hearted.

Soon after midnight the first of the land breeze began making along the river and Thurso ordered sail to be got up and all to be made ready for purchasing anchor. At two they weighed an got out to sea, the wind by this time giving a good offing. In the cover of darkness, as quietly as possible, the Liverpool Merchant began to steer a course south-eastward. but when the ship met the deep sea well, the rhythm of her movement changed and the people in the cramped and fetid darkness of the hold, understanding that they had lost all hope of returning to their homes set up a great cry of desolation and despair that carried over the water to the other ships in the road and the slaves in the holds of the ships heard it and answered with wild shouts and screams, so that for people lying awake in villages along the shore and solitary fishermen up before dawn, there was a period when the night resounded with the echoes of lamentation.

Sacred Hunger is a difficult read–passages like this one are piercing, painful to really digest and admit. But this is an important book. Unsworth’s insight into the complex motives behind greed, dominion, mercy, and kindness make this much more than a simple story about a slave ship in the mid-1700s. In fact, in this book we see these emotions and attributes come up in almost all relationships: between man and woman, between captain and sailor, between English and Native-American, between one tribe and another, between parents and children. Its a complex world, but Unsworth makes it flow smoothly. Also, even though there are many relationships which all are used to further themes, this book is far from contrived. The characters and their relationships are real and familiar – that’s what’s scary.

In Sacred Hunger there is mutiny aboard a slave ship. After grounding the ship, the surviving whites and blacks begin their own community in south Florida. Meanwhile, the ship owner’s son single-mindedly seeks revenge against the crew, particularly against his cousin, the ship’s doctor. But it is not that simple. Even while the new community is attempting to grow into a free society, where there are no distinctions between blacks and whites, Unsworth shows just how difficult such a task is.

In the dialogue, Unsworth has the ability to show the feelings of the slave traders while instilling pure irony:

‘Tis a terrible trade, them not in it will never know the hardships, to see your profits dribblin’ in the sea an’ nothin’ you can do.

Such passages are amusing at the same time they evoke reprehension. But in a frightening way they made me think about how many awful things we do today without quite understanding how ridiculous our position is. Then there are the illuminating, yet discouraging passages:

Nothing a man suffers will prevent him from inflicting suffering on others.

This book recognizes the difficulties inherent in trying to live in an equal society. In fact, some of its interesting passages deal with building a community through rhetorical strategy. While I didn’t feel like it was a fully-fleshed theme, story-telling and legend-making definitely are important, especially since Sacred Hunger itself, in a nice but potentially forgetful literary device, is set up to be based on the ramblings of an old mulatto many years after the story has ended:

But mainly he talked – of a Liverpool ship, of a white father who had been a doctor aboard her and had never died, a childhood of wonders in a place of eternal sunshine, jungle hummocks, great flocks of white birds rising from flooded savannahs, a settlement where white and black lived together in perfect accord.

The only real problem I had with this book was the tone.  I guess when an author takes on a theme like this, I expect prose on the scale of Melville.  Unsworth either couldn’t or chose not to tell this story that way.  There are few moments of poetry.  Mostly the tone is fairly familiar.  Unsworth still had many insights, but the methods he chose to portray them were sometimes too simple.  In my opinion.

Notwithstanding that drawback, I thought this was a contender for the Best of the Booker shortlist. I wish it had more attention.

After you read the book:

Thankfully this book did not dip down to where many moral indignation novels (MINs) sink.  John Carrey wrote about the potential pitfall in his 2003 essay on chairing the Man Booker Prize that has a paragraph on MINs:

Floggings, brandings, rapes, massacres, and women giving birth far from medical aid are among the customary set pieces. The native victims are portrayed as eco-friendly and endowed with delicate modes of consciousness beyond the scope of depraved Europeans. The villains, on the other hand, are always white and usually English. From the viewpoint of origin, class and education they closely resemble the readers whom the author can most realistically expect to buy his or her wares.

While Sacred Hunger is a full-blown moral indignation novel, the ending made me indignant about the whole human race, not just the whites!  I was kind of tossing and turning with this novel and felt it was nothing too original until the ship was lost and the survivors set up their colony.  Then the way the factions started building again, even among the former slaves who suddenly felt they needed slaves . . . I was really drawn into the issues, which suddenly became a lot more powerful to me.

7 comments to Barry Unsworth: Sacred Hunger

  • Of all the Unsworth books that I have read, this is my least favorite. The writing style was not good.

    I don’t understand why it won the Booker.

  • That’s good news for me, then, Isabel, since I have yet to read any other Unsworth book and I liked this one. I did almost pick up Morality Play a couple of days ago – do you recommend it?

    And though I liked it, I agree about the poor writing style. It felt sophomoric. In my post on J.G. Farrell’s The Siege of Krishnapur I noted that I wished Farrell had written Sacred Hunger too – his style was so much more sophisticated and nuanced, which works better for a historical novel in my mind, especially one taking on such a weighty subject.

  • Morality Play was my first Unsworth and it was worthy.

    I met him many years ago, when he came to the Tennessee Williams Festival. He is very nice and funny and sounds like Sean Connery and he admits that he sounds like Sean because they are from the same part of the world.

  • Next time I read an Unsworth novel I’ll have to imagine it in the voice of Sean Connery then! Thanks for the insight on Unsworth, Isabel. I have yet to mix and mingle with any author who has been up for one of the major prizes. Maybe someday!

  • lizzysiddal

    I’ve been hoping in vain for Barry Unsworth to come up to Edinburgh but it may be a little too cold for him now that he’s been abroad for so many years. Still you may enjoy this interview at:

    http://www.kwls.org/lit/kwls_blog/2008/06/intensity_of_ilusiona_conversa.cfm

    Great blog and great review of one of my favourite Booker winners.

  • Thanks for the link to that great interview, Lizzy. Unsworth gave nice long answers to the questions. It’s especially encouraging to see him at such an age still talk with excitement about the inception of a new book! I think that soon I will pick out a few more of his books to read.

    And thanks for the kind words about my blog. I enjoy yours too, and especially like the photos of your book piles!

  • [...] familiar and run-of-the-mill.  It probably doesn’t help that I read Barry Unsworth’s Sacred Hunger earlier this year.  The two are alike in style (both have a similar narrative thrust and feel) but [...]

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Baymak Kombi Servisi geciktirici sprey online dizi izle