<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Margaret Atwood: Alias Grace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2008/07/03/margaret-atwoods-alias-grace/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2008/07/03/margaret-atwoods-alias-grace/</link>
	<description>Book reviews of contemporary literary fiction and modern classics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 18:41:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor Berrett</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2008/07/03/margaret-atwoods-alias-grace/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor Berrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 11:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?p=31#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Sharon!  So glad you visited the site and gave your insights.  While reading them, I have to say, I saw this book from a different perspective and appreciated aspects of it even more - just like the good old days in your living room!  I particularly liked what you had to say about Jordan.  At the beginning of the novel I kept wondering if he&#039;d be the one to see some light.  His perceptions of women were even then misogynistic, thinking of marriage only as a means to two things at first: sex and appeasing mother.  But then later on he seems to come around and appreciate the peace he could attain, and he seems to sympathize with Grace and his landlady.  Then it all came crashing down (and, interestingly, a woman was the impetus).  I&#039;m glad that his portion of the story goes where it goes.  I think it made me understand more.
I definitely agree that in the end it feels like Atwood got tired of writing the book.  I definitely got tired of reading it over the last 50 pages or so.
My best wishes to you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sharon!  So glad you visited the site and gave your insights.  While reading them, I have to say, I saw this book from a different perspective and appreciated aspects of it even more &#8211; just like the good old days in your living room!  I particularly liked what you had to say about Jordan.  At the beginning of the novel I kept wondering if he&#8217;d be the one to see some light.  His perceptions of women were even then misogynistic, thinking of marriage only as a means to two things at first: sex and appeasing mother.  But then later on he seems to come around and appreciate the peace he could attain, and he seems to sympathize with Grace and his landlady.  Then it all came crashing down (and, interestingly, a woman was the impetus).  I&#8217;m glad that his portion of the story goes where it goes.  I think it made me understand more.<br />
I definitely agree that in the end it feels like Atwood got tired of writing the book.  I definitely got tired of reading it over the last 50 pages or so.<br />
My best wishes to you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S. Morgan</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2008/07/03/margaret-atwoods-alias-grace/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 09:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?p=31#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Thanks for alerting me to your site. So glad to be here. I&#039;ll pretend it&#039;s my living room, by a river, where I sit with my good friends.

As I read A.G., I felt I was climbing into good literature and anticipated that kind of peculiar heady satisfaction. However, I had NOT looked forward to reading this particular Atwood book as I had slowly become disillusioned with her futuristic stuff (not ever a fan of the &quot;future&quot;) and with some volumes of poetry I&#039;d recently read. I believe it was Atwood&#039;s writing and the tension she weaves in and out that built the anticipation in me as I flipped rather carelessly through the opening pages, then was hooked in to this woman&#039;s life, whom I could not understand. (Whew. Long sentence.)Grace is always just out of reach. Many times Atwood has me sympathizing with her as I think I&#039;m watching a Thomas Hardy character pushed around by a careless universe. But, then, Atwood slips in vague details that make me feel uncomfortable about my own perception. I cannot trust Grace: News articles, pieces of the trial, images of her glee over stealing the dresses--nothing I can name directly, but I begin to feel deceived by my own gullibility--after all, this is a murderess. But, her long internment in disgusting conditions, her peculiar insanity, her manipulations to improve her conditions (wouldn&#039;t we do the same?) still fascinate me. But, is her insanity calculated? I don&#039;t think so. Is she a temptress? I see her rather as a woman, who is more illiterate and dense than I want to admit, living in a purely survival mode. After a while, not even her insanity is complicated--it&#039;s simply a removal from a world that never gives her much, so she snatches what she can like a sneaky, guilty child--at times, even like an animal trying to exist. In the end I saw her as a weak woman who never has the intelligence or will to shape her own life, so she floats, which, Atwood says  eventually yields to the pull of gravity--downward. Thus, I can forgive her actions much more than I can Jordon&#039;s. Atwood builds him as intelligent enough to know better. He can choose not to slide into slime. He has the discipline to obtain much knowledge, which we both know does not come easy, but he slides just the same. Where&#039;s the redemption in this book? I, also, felt disappointed, Trevor. From just after the story switches to focus more on Dr. Jordan&#039;s dinky little room (more of a prison than Grace&#039;s literal prison), I felt the energy drain from the book, almost like Atwood just got tired of writing it. I don&#039;t know. It does stay with me though, which I wonder over, and I do admire the choice of such a strange subject: she writes about a woman whom I refused to believe was slightly dim-witted and manipulative until the end. (I thought she was naive like a child through the first half of the book. Atwood&#039;s genius of complications?) She writes of a doctor who is more insane than those he tends because he spends so much energy hiding it from himself and the world--until it cracks him open. Grace&#039;s insanity is not as dangerous as his.
I look forward to Atwood publishing more books. But, I&#039;m hoping the bitterness and anger of her latest poetry will not intrude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for alerting me to your site. So glad to be here. I&#8217;ll pretend it&#8217;s my living room, by a river, where I sit with my good friends.</p>
<p>As I read A.G., I felt I was climbing into good literature and anticipated that kind of peculiar heady satisfaction. However, I had NOT looked forward to reading this particular Atwood book as I had slowly become disillusioned with her futuristic stuff (not ever a fan of the &#8220;future&#8221;) and with some volumes of poetry I&#8217;d recently read. I believe it was Atwood&#8217;s writing and the tension she weaves in and out that built the anticipation in me as I flipped rather carelessly through the opening pages, then was hooked in to this woman&#8217;s life, whom I could not understand. (Whew. Long sentence.)Grace is always just out of reach. Many times Atwood has me sympathizing with her as I think I&#8217;m watching a Thomas Hardy character pushed around by a careless universe. But, then, Atwood slips in vague details that make me feel uncomfortable about my own perception. I cannot trust Grace: News articles, pieces of the trial, images of her glee over stealing the dresses&#8211;nothing I can name directly, but I begin to feel deceived by my own gullibility&#8211;after all, this is a murderess. But, her long internment in disgusting conditions, her peculiar insanity, her manipulations to improve her conditions (wouldn&#8217;t we do the same?) still fascinate me. But, is her insanity calculated? I don&#8217;t think so. Is she a temptress? I see her rather as a woman, who is more illiterate and dense than I want to admit, living in a purely survival mode. After a while, not even her insanity is complicated&#8211;it&#8217;s simply a removal from a world that never gives her much, so she snatches what she can like a sneaky, guilty child&#8211;at times, even like an animal trying to exist. In the end I saw her as a weak woman who never has the intelligence or will to shape her own life, so she floats, which, Atwood says  eventually yields to the pull of gravity&#8211;downward. Thus, I can forgive her actions much more than I can Jordon&#8217;s. Atwood builds him as intelligent enough to know better. He can choose not to slide into slime. He has the discipline to obtain much knowledge, which we both know does not come easy, but he slides just the same. Where&#8217;s the redemption in this book? I, also, felt disappointed, Trevor. From just after the story switches to focus more on Dr. Jordan&#8217;s dinky little room (more of a prison than Grace&#8217;s literal prison), I felt the energy drain from the book, almost like Atwood just got tired of writing it. I don&#8217;t know. It does stay with me though, which I wonder over, and I do admire the choice of such a strange subject: she writes about a woman whom I refused to believe was slightly dim-witted and manipulative until the end. (I thought she was naive like a child through the first half of the book. Atwood&#8217;s genius of complications?) She writes of a doctor who is more insane than those he tends because he spends so much energy hiding it from himself and the world&#8211;until it cracks him open. Grace&#8217;s insanity is not as dangerous as his.<br />
I look forward to Atwood publishing more books. But, I&#8217;m hoping the bitterness and anger of her latest poetry will not intrude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

