<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Philip Roth: The Ghost Writer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2008/07/04/philip-roths-the-ghost-writer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2008/07/04/philip-roths-the-ghost-writer/</link>
	<description>Book reviews of contemporary literary fiction and modern classics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:33:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mookse and the Gripes &#187; December Recommendations</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2008/07/04/philip-roths-the-ghost-writer/comment-page-1/#comment-63363</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mookse and the Gripes &#187; December Recommendations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 19:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?p=38#comment-63363</guid>
		<description>[...] Ghost Writer, by Philip Roth (original review July 4, 2008).  I&#8217;ve recommended this one before and I&#8217;ll recommend it again (because I know there [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ghost Writer, by Philip Roth (original review July 4, 2008).  I&#8217;ve recommended this one before and I&#8217;ll recommend it again (because I know there [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mookse and the Gripes &#187; July Recommendations</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2008/07/04/philip-roths-the-ghost-writer/comment-page-1/#comment-49263</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mookse and the Gripes &#187; July Recommendations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 14:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?p=38#comment-49263</guid>
		<description>[...] Ghost Writer, by Philip Roth (original review from July 4, 2008).  This is not a summer book (it&#8217;s a crsip New England winter&#8217;s night followed by a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ghost Writer, by Philip Roth (original review from July 4, 2008).  This is not a summer book (it&#8217;s a crsip New England winter&#8217;s night followed by a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Roth &#8212; The Ghost Writer &#171; underthought</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2008/07/04/philip-roths-the-ghost-writer/comment-page-1/#comment-1271</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Roth &#8212; The Ghost Writer &#171; underthought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?p=38#comment-1271</guid>
		<description>[...] can read more about The Ghost Writer here and here. Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Philip Roth — Exit GhostThe Ghost WriterPhilip [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can read more about The Ghost Writer here and here. Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Philip Roth — Exit GhostThe Ghost WriterPhilip [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Best Reads of 2008 &#171; The Mookse and the Gripes</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2008/07/04/philip-roths-the-ghost-writer/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>My Best Reads of 2008 &#171; The Mookse and the Gripes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?p=38#comment-32</guid>
		<description>[...] The Ghost Writer, by Philip Roth:  This is the book that got me addicted to Philip Roth, and I think it might still [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Ghost Writer, by Philip Roth:  This is the book that got me addicted to Philip Roth, and I think it might still [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Cairnduff</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2008/07/04/philip-roths-the-ghost-writer/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Cairnduff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?p=38#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Hi Trevor,

You make a very good case for The Ghost Writer there, my concern primarily was embarking on another series when I&#039;m part way through A Dance to the Music of Time, but it&#039;s stand alone nature takes that concern away largely.

Thanks for the recommendation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Trevor,</p>
<p>You make a very good case for The Ghost Writer there, my concern primarily was embarking on another series when I&#8217;m part way through A Dance to the Music of Time, but it&#8217;s stand alone nature takes that concern away largely.</p>
<p>Thanks for the recommendation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2008/07/04/philip-roths-the-ghost-writer/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 20:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?p=38#comment-30</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You know, Stewart, I’m not sure I’ve ever taken an author on from the beginning to the end - at least, not one who has written several books. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
It&#039;s something I&#039;ve been wanting to do with my blog, but other books continue to pop up. Although I&#039;ve read a number of John Steinbecks, I&#039;ve started from the start there too with &lt;em&gt;Cup Of Gold&lt;/em&gt;. Same goes for Jim Crace, Cormac McCarthy, and, one day, Saul Bellow. To my mind, starting at the beginning is when they were still learning the ropes, so to speak, and should hopefully offer an &lt;em&gt;in&lt;/em&gt; to their ideas, themes, and style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You know, Stewart, I’m not sure I’ve ever taken an author on from the beginning to the end &#8211; at least, not one who has written several books. </p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s something I&#8217;ve been wanting to do with my blog, but other books continue to pop up. Although I&#8217;ve read a number of John Steinbecks, I&#8217;ve started from the start there too with <em>Cup Of Gold</em>. Same goes for Jim Crace, Cormac McCarthy, and, one day, Saul Bellow. To my mind, starting at the beginning is when they were still learning the ropes, so to speak, and should hopefully offer an <em>in</em> to their ideas, themes, and style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor Berrett</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2008/07/04/philip-roths-the-ghost-writer/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor Berrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?p=38#comment-29</guid>
		<description>You know, Stewart, I&#039;m not sure I&#039;ve ever taken an author on from the beginning to the end - at least, not one who has written several books.  I&#039;d like to try that sometime.  Good luck with your trek through Roth.  I look forward to your reviews on his early books because I have not read any of them pre-&lt;em&gt;The Ghost Writer&lt;/em&gt;.

Does anyone have any suggestions for other authors who are particularly suited to being read from first book to last consecutively?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, Stewart, I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;ve ever taken an author on from the beginning to the end &#8211; at least, not one who has written several books.  I&#8217;d like to try that sometime.  Good luck with your trek through Roth.  I look forward to your reviews on his early books because I have not read any of them pre-<em>The Ghost Writer</em>.</p>
<p>Does anyone have any suggestions for other authors who are particularly suited to being read from first book to last consecutively?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2008/07/04/philip-roths-the-ghost-writer/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 11:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?p=38#comment-31</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I actually think that &lt;em&gt;The Ghost Writer&lt;/em&gt; is the perfect start to a long relationship with Roth.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I’m taking a different tack: reading his output in consecutive order. Granted, I’ve ony read his first one, &lt;a href=&quot;//booklit.com/blog/2008/03/27/philip-roth-goodbye-columbus/”&quot; title=&quot;”Philip&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Goodbye, Columbus&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, which comes bundled, as far as I know, with the only published Roth short stories. Next up, after the Booker longlist is polished off, will be &lt;em&gt;Letting Go&lt;/em&gt;, his longest novel at over six hundred pages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I actually think that <em>The Ghost Writer</em> is the perfect start to a long relationship with Roth.</p></blockquote>
<p>I’m taking a different tack: reading his output in consecutive order. Granted, I’ve ony read his first one, <a href="//booklit.com/blog/2008/03/27/philip-roth-goodbye-columbus/”" title="”Philip" rel="nofollow"><em>Goodbye, Columbus</em></a>, which comes bundled, as far as I know, with the only published Roth short stories. Next up, after the Booker longlist is polished off, will be <em>Letting Go</em>, his longest novel at over six hundred pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor Berrett</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2008/07/04/philip-roths-the-ghost-writer/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor Berrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?p=38#comment-27</guid>
		<description>I actually think that &lt;em&gt;The Ghost Writer&lt;/em&gt; is the perfect start to a long relationship with Roth.

Even though it is the first book in a series, all of the books stand alone.  You could read &lt;em&gt;The Ghost Writer&lt;/em&gt; this year and then revisit Zuckerman, like an old acquaintance, in a year or two when he&#039;s worked out some things and become famous.  Then a few years later, visit him in his middle-aged pain.  Or you could even read them out of order, I&#039;ve heard.

&lt;em&gt;The Ghost Writer&lt;/em&gt; doesn&#039;t call for a sequel either.  It has a very fulfilling ending that I love thinking about.  Furthermore, I think because in a way the book takes Roth himself back to the beginning it also introduces the rest of Roth&#039;s work (much - most - of which I still have to read).  And if that doesn&#039;t encourage you, each book is short, with fairly large type, and the prose is smooth as can be, easy to slide right through.

But if the story doesn&#039;t appeal, Roth has an award-winning record like no other author.  He has plenty of excellent books out there, with great stories, stunning literary pyrotechnics, and nuanced motifs that delight and haunt.

I wouldn&#039;t recommend starting with &lt;em&gt;Everyman&lt;/em&gt;.  As great as that book was, I think it would have been more fulfilling had I read it after knowing Roth&#039;s work better.  I loved it, but it didn&#039;t tell me to go read the rest of his books.  &lt;em&gt;The Ghost Writer&lt;/em&gt; did.

I look forward to your comments about Roth when that day comes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually think that <em>The Ghost Writer</em> is the perfect start to a long relationship with Roth.</p>
<p>Even though it is the first book in a series, all of the books stand alone.  You could read <em>The Ghost Writer</em> this year and then revisit Zuckerman, like an old acquaintance, in a year or two when he&#8217;s worked out some things and become famous.  Then a few years later, visit him in his middle-aged pain.  Or you could even read them out of order, I&#8217;ve heard.</p>
<p><em>The Ghost Writer</em> doesn&#8217;t call for a sequel either.  It has a very fulfilling ending that I love thinking about.  Furthermore, I think because in a way the book takes Roth himself back to the beginning it also introduces the rest of Roth&#8217;s work (much &#8211; most &#8211; of which I still have to read).  And if that doesn&#8217;t encourage you, each book is short, with fairly large type, and the prose is smooth as can be, easy to slide right through.</p>
<p>But if the story doesn&#8217;t appeal, Roth has an award-winning record like no other author.  He has plenty of excellent books out there, with great stories, stunning literary pyrotechnics, and nuanced motifs that delight and haunt.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t recommend starting with <em>Everyman</em>.  As great as that book was, I think it would have been more fulfilling had I read it after knowing Roth&#8217;s work better.  I loved it, but it didn&#8217;t tell me to go read the rest of his books.  <em>The Ghost Writer</em> did.</p>
<p>I look forward to your comments about Roth when that day comes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Cairnduff</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2008/07/04/philip-roths-the-ghost-writer/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Cairnduff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?p=38#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Hi Trevor, I thought I was in the comments section for The Anatomy Lesson, where my post above sits a bit more naturally.  Hope that makes my post make a bit more sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Trevor, I thought I was in the comments section for The Anatomy Lesson, where my post above sits a bit more naturally.  Hope that makes my post make a bit more sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

