<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pat Barker&#8217;s The Ghost Road</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2008/07/08/pat-barkers-the-ghost-road/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2008/07/08/pat-barkers-the-ghost-road/</link>
	<description>Book reviews of contemporary literary fiction and modern classics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:33:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor Berrett</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2008/07/08/pat-barkers-the-ghost-road/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor Berrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?p=51#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Redhead, you&#039;ve definitely given me food for thought.  I must go back and read the first two and then the third one again.  Not too much to ask since they are all fairly short with big type.  And Barker&#039;s prose is straightforward and the story quite compelling.  When I get there, I&#039;ll let you know what I think!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Redhead, you&#8217;ve definitely given me food for thought.  I must go back and read the first two and then the third one again.  Not too much to ask since they are all fairly short with big type.  And Barker&#8217;s prose is straightforward and the story quite compelling.  When I get there, I&#8217;ll let you know what I think!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ghost Road by Pat Barker &#171; RedHead Ramble</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2008/07/08/pat-barkers-the-ghost-road/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ghost Road by Pat Barker &#171; RedHead Ramble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 11:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?p=51#comment-44</guid>
		<description>[...] The Mookse and the Gripes review [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Mookse and the Gripes review [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redheadrambles</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2008/07/08/pat-barkers-the-ghost-road/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>redheadrambles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 11:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?p=51#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Interesting review. As I have said before I think my opinions on the book were more favorable because I felt like I built up a strong relationship with Billy Prior and Rivers by following them through the trilogy. Also, these were the first WWI novels I had read so it had a big impact on me. In particular, I got a strong sense of the wastage of youth, I know this is probably not new but this trilogy brought it home more powerfully then anything else I have read or watched. I agree with the sex and immortality link but my interpretation was that Billy is bisexual rather than homosexual and I wondered how much of his sexuality was influenced by the war and his childhood abuse..
Rivers was an interesting character to me because he has to absorb so much - yet he obviously struggles with sending men back to the front and feels some guilt at not being able to fight himself.
I do agree with your first point that a book should stand alone to win the Booker but we all know that some prizes are handed out in recognition of an authors prior work - Amsterdam is an example. In this case I think Regeneration is what is being awarded....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting review. As I have said before I think my opinions on the book were more favorable because I felt like I built up a strong relationship with Billy Prior and Rivers by following them through the trilogy. Also, these were the first WWI novels I had read so it had a big impact on me. In particular, I got a strong sense of the wastage of youth, I know this is probably not new but this trilogy brought it home more powerfully then anything else I have read or watched. I agree with the sex and immortality link but my interpretation was that Billy is bisexual rather than homosexual and I wondered how much of his sexuality was influenced by the war and his childhood abuse..<br />
Rivers was an interesting character to me because he has to absorb so much &#8211; yet he obviously struggles with sending men back to the front and feels some guilt at not being able to fight himself.<br />
I do agree with your first point that a book should stand alone to win the Booker but we all know that some prizes are handed out in recognition of an authors prior work &#8211; Amsterdam is an example. In this case I think Regeneration is what is being awarded&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

