This review was originally slated to post last Tuesday, the day John Updike died but before his death was announced. I’m not sure how I would have felt about that, but this now gives me the opportunity to put up a sort of review in memorium. I’m not yet familiar with most of Updike’s work. I’ve read only a few of his short stories, and those long enough ago that I don’t remember them though I remember not understanding them. I was in the bookstore a couple of months ago with a coupon for a free book, and I knew I wanted to use it to get to know Updike. Perhaps fortuitously for me, the bookstore did not have any of the Rabbit books (strange, I know). I’d heard good things about Bech though, so I grabbed the first one: Bech: A Book (1970).
This book is actually a collection of short pieces written during the 1960s and published principally in The New Yorker. In them we come to know Updike’s antithetical alterego (or is it correct to say the anti-alterego?), Henry Bech, a Jewish New Yorker whose suffering from writer’s block. Bech has never married, and his behavior at 40 years of age is decidedly curmudgeon. Yet, in him we get a whiff of some of Updike’s own character. Then again, perhaps we get no more here than we get in any other book by any other author. But Updike himself, in his very playful introduction to this collection, suggests there’s at least a bit of him in here.
Well, if you must commit the artistic indecency of writnig about a writer, better I suppose about me than about you. Except, reading along in these, I wonder if it is me, enough me, purely me. At first blush, for example, in Bulgaria (eclectic sexuality, bravura narcissism, thinning curly hari), I sound like some gentlemanly Norman Mailer; then that London glimpse of silver hair glints more of gallant, glamorous Bellow, the King of the Leprechauns, than of stolid old homely yours truly. My childhood seems out of Alex Portnoy and my ancestral past out of I.B. Singer. I get a whiff of Malamud in your city breezes, and I am paranoid to feel my “block” an ignoble version of the more or less noble renunciations of H. Roth, D. Fuchs, and J. Salinger? Withal, something Waspish, theological, scared, and insulatingly ironical that derives, my wild surmise is, from you.
It is also in this introduction that I was really introduced to Updike’s love for poetry and wordgames. He obviously had fun writing these stories:
I don’t suppose your publishing this little jeu of a book will do either of us drastic harm.
However, though the introduction started me off on the right foot, the first story “Rich in Russia” confused me. I was expecting to really get a sense for this character. Updike’s linguistic flavor was present (“Virtue, in Russia as in his childhood, seemed something that arose from men, like a comforting body odor, rather than something from above, that impaled the struggling soul like a moth on a pin.”), but I didn’t care for Bech himself. It’s not that I didn’t like Bech. I really didn’t care one way or the other. My disinterestedness continued in the second story, “Bech in Rumania; or, The Rumanian Chauffeur.”
These were interesting stories in their own way. Bech, not getting too much out in the publishing world these days, has been invited to tour the countries of Eastern Europe. In his encounters we get a sense for the man. But like I said, I was not engaged.
All of this changed with the subsequent stories: “The Bulgarian Poetess,” “Bech Takes Pot Luck,” “Bech Panics,” “Bech Swings?,” and finally “Bech Enters Heaven.” The many things I’d heard about Bech - how compelling his particular mixture of libido and impotence was, how offbeat his observations were, how well Updike filled this man up with life, etc. – came to be in me. I guess I like my alter-ego authors to have some sort of existential crisis. It began with this beauty of a line: “Actuality is a running impoverishment of possibility.” Suddenly Bech the man became accessible to me on a deeper level, and surprisingly to me, his first stories – the ones I’d discounted – became significant.
My personal favorite was “Bech Panics.” It begins this way:
This moment in Bech’s pilgrimage must be approached reverently, hesitantly, as befits a mystery. We have these few slides: Bech posing before a roomful of well-groomed girls spread seraglio-style on the floor, Bech lying awake in the frily guest room of a dormitory, Bech conversing beside a granite chapel with a woman in a purple catsuit, Bech throwing himself like a seed upon the leafy sweet earth of Virginia, within a grove of oaks on the edge of the campus, and mutely begging Someone, Something, for mercy.
In this story, we meet up with Bech a few months into the relationship he began at the end of “Bech Takes Pot Luck” (“As to love, he had been recently processed by a pair of sisters, first the one, and then the other; the one was neurotic and angular and harsh and glamorous and childless and exhausting, and the other had been sane and soft and plain and maternal and exhausting.”). A southern female voice calls him on the phone to invite him to speak to an all-girls college in Virginia. Bech, who doesn’t accept invitations to speak at Columbia two subway stops away, takes this chance to get one thousand miles away from his latest mistress, or perhaps I’m being unfair there. What he finds when he arrives is a great crisis of his faith – no, not in the Jewish religion, Bech doesn’t believe in that, but in his faith in himself, in his being, in his own value as an author, and in the value of art itself.
He saw that even in an age of science and unbelief our ideas are dreams, styles, superstitions, mere animal noises intended to repel or attract. He looked around the ring of munching females and saw their bodies as a Martian or a mollusc might see them, as pulpy stalks of bundled nerves oddly pinched to a bud of concentration in the head, a hairy bone knob holding some pounds of jelly in which a trillion circuits, mostly dead, kept records, coded motor operations, and generated an excess of electricity that pressed into the hairless side of the head and leaked through orifices, in the form of pained, hopeful noises and a simian dance of wrinkles. Impossible mirage! A blot on nothingness. And to think that all the efforts of his life – his preening, his lovemaking, his typing – boiled down to the attempt to displace a few sparks, to bias a few circuits, within some random other scoops of jelly that would, in less time than it takes the Andreas Fault to shrug or the tail-tip star of Scorpio to crawl an inch across the map of Heaven, be utterly dissolved.
I’m not sure, had I encountered the first few stories in The New Yorker, I would have been able to follow them. As I said above, the stories came alive as they built on one another. For me, these stories work best in book form, all compiled into one place, ready to be read as if a novel and not as discreet parts. And now that I’m done with Bech: A Book, I can’t wait to get a hold of Bech Is Back and Bech at Bay. Perhaps I’ll encounter them on some library shelf in the Mid-West. I think that would make Updike happy.