<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cynthia Ozick: The Shawl</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2009/02/12/cynthia-ozicks-the-shawl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2009/02/12/cynthia-ozicks-the-shawl/</link>
	<description>Book reviews of contemporary literary fiction and modern classics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 18:41:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2009/02/12/cynthia-ozicks-the-shawl/comment-page-1/#comment-1161</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 02:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/?p=1170#comment-1161</guid>
		<description>Thanks for giving me another image when I think of &quot;pithy&quot; John.  I also have my own that comes to mind when I hear the word, but it&#039;s much less fun.  A law professor once used the word to describe Oliver Wendall Holmes, a famous U.S. Supreme Court justice who really had a way with words.  For example, it is from him that we have the &quot;fruit of the poisonous tree&quot; doctrine when examining evidence procured in violation of the constitution.  I&#039;m glad to now have a comical context!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for giving me another image when I think of &#8220;pithy&#8221; John.  I also have my own that comes to mind when I hear the word, but it&#8217;s much less fun.  A law professor once used the word to describe Oliver Wendall Holmes, a famous U.S. Supreme Court justice who really had a way with words.  For example, it is from him that we have the &#8220;fruit of the poisonous tree&#8221; doctrine when examining evidence procured in violation of the constitution.  I&#8217;m glad to now have a comical context!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Self</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2009/02/12/cynthia-ozicks-the-shawl/comment-page-1/#comment-1157</link>
		<dc:creator>John Self</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/?p=1170#comment-1157</guid>
		<description>When I hear the word &#039;pithy&#039; I always think of the episode of &lt;em&gt;Fawlty Towers&lt;/em&gt; where Basil has been assaulted by an irate guest, and is trying to laugh it off as though it&#039;s a private joke between them, to try to avoid looking bad in front of the other guests.

BASIL: (recoiling in agony from the punch but smiling gamely) Ha-ha-&lt;em&gt;ha-ha!&lt;/em&gt;
GUEST: Did I say something amusing, Mr Fawlty?
BASIL: ...Well, more &lt;em&gt;pithy&lt;/em&gt;, I suppose.

Anyway, nicely done, Trevor.  I don&#039;t have much to add except to urge Kevin and others to read these stories as soon as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I hear the word &#8216;pithy&#8217; I always think of the episode of <em>Fawlty Towers</em> where Basil has been assaulted by an irate guest, and is trying to laugh it off as though it&#8217;s a private joke between them, to try to avoid looking bad in front of the other guests.</p>
<p>BASIL: (recoiling in agony from the punch but smiling gamely) Ha-ha-<em>ha-ha!</em><br />
GUEST: Did I say something amusing, Mr Fawlty?<br />
BASIL: &#8230;Well, more <em>pithy</em>, I suppose.</p>
<p>Anyway, nicely done, Trevor.  I don&#8217;t have much to add except to urge Kevin and others to read these stories as soon as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2009/02/12/cynthia-ozicks-the-shawl/comment-page-1/#comment-1140</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/?p=1170#comment-1140</guid>
		<description>Thanks Isabel!  I consider being pithy a great compliment!  

I don&#039;t know much about Ozick&#039;s other word, just a bit about &lt;em&gt;Heir to the Glimmering World&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;The Puttermesser Papers&lt;/em&gt;.  I&#039;m anxious to get to know Ozick better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Isabel!  I consider being pithy a great compliment!  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know much about Ozick&#8217;s other word, just a bit about <em>Heir to the Glimmering World</em> and <em>The Puttermesser Papers</em>.  I&#8217;m anxious to get to know Ozick better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isabel</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2009/02/12/cynthia-ozicks-the-shawl/comment-page-1/#comment-1136</link>
		<dc:creator>Isabel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/?p=1170#comment-1136</guid>
		<description>Pithy review, but well done.

I hope to find her works soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pithy review, but well done.</p>
<p>I hope to find her works soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2009/02/12/cynthia-ozicks-the-shawl/comment-page-1/#comment-1134</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 02:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/?p=1170#comment-1134</guid>
		<description>The great thing about this book is that it can move from your TBR list to your R list very quickly.  I&#039;m excited to hear your thoughts when you get through it - and &lt;em&gt;Gilead&lt;/em&gt;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The great thing about this book is that it can move from your TBR list to your R list very quickly.  I&#8217;m excited to hear your thoughts when you get through it &#8211; and <em>Gilead</em>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: _lethe_</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2009/02/12/cynthia-ozicks-the-shawl/comment-page-1/#comment-1132</link>
		<dc:creator>_lethe_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/?p=1170#comment-1132</guid>
		<description>What a great review, this book goes straight onto my TBR list.

I have Ozick&#039;s collection &quot;Levitation&quot;, but read so long ago that I hardly remember a thing about it. As it happens, Jayne Anne Phillips (&quot;Black Tickets&quot;) is Ozick&#039;s neighbour on my bookshelf.

Also, I&#039;m halfway through &quot;Gilead&quot; and think it&#039;s beautiful so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a great review, this book goes straight onto my TBR list.</p>
<p>I have Ozick&#8217;s collection &#8220;Levitation&#8221;, but read so long ago that I hardly remember a thing about it. As it happens, Jayne Anne Phillips (&#8220;Black Tickets&#8221;) is Ozick&#8217;s neighbour on my bookshelf.</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;m halfway through &#8220;Gilead&#8221; and think it&#8217;s beautiful so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2009/02/12/cynthia-ozicks-the-shawl/comment-page-1/#comment-1131</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 20:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/?p=1170#comment-1131</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You are doing a good job of investigating American women writers.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That&#039;s because I have done such a bad job up to now.  By the way, speaking of American women writers, I finished Jayne Anne Phillips new book about a week ago and she has my interview questions in hand and said she thinks she&#039;ll be able to get to them in the next week or so, probably allowing me to post it on February 20 - so there&#039;s another American woman writer I&#039;ll have investigated!  It&#039;s been a great experience!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You are doing a good job of investigating American women writers.</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s because I have done such a bad job up to now.  By the way, speaking of American women writers, I finished Jayne Anne Phillips new book about a week ago and she has my interview questions in hand and said she thinks she&#8217;ll be able to get to them in the next week or so, probably allowing me to post it on February 20 &#8211; so there&#8217;s another American woman writer I&#8217;ll have investigated!  It&#8217;s been a great experience!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KevinfromCanada</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2009/02/12/cynthia-ozicks-the-shawl/comment-page-1/#comment-1128</link>
		<dc:creator>KevinfromCanada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/?p=1170#comment-1128</guid>
		<description>Most interesting thoughts on a book that I have not read, but have every intention of visiting.  You are doing a good job of investigating American women writers -- personally, I prefer Ozick to Robinson, but suspect I am in the minority opinion there.  Then again, most of my opinions are in the minority.  Oh well.  What I particularly like about Ozick is her ability to frame a story in a way that allows the reader to approach it from a number of different perspectives -- it is kind of like looking at a well-cut diamond in that you can adopt a number of observation points and they all work.  Whereas with Robinson I feel that I am being forced/directed into one interpretation -- and since it is one that I am not comfortable with, I find myself resisting the book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most interesting thoughts on a book that I have not read, but have every intention of visiting.  You are doing a good job of investigating American women writers &#8212; personally, I prefer Ozick to Robinson, but suspect I am in the minority opinion there.  Then again, most of my opinions are in the minority.  Oh well.  What I particularly like about Ozick is her ability to frame a story in a way that allows the reader to approach it from a number of different perspectives &#8212; it is kind of like looking at a well-cut diamond in that you can adopt a number of observation points and they all work.  Whereas with Robinson I feel that I am being forced/directed into one interpretation &#8212; and since it is one that I am not comfortable with, I find myself resisting the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

