<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Crummey: Galore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2009/09/23/michael-crummey-galore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2009/09/23/michael-crummey-galore/</link>
	<description>Book reviews of contemporary literary fiction and modern classics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 10:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2009/09/23/michael-crummey-galore/comment-page-1/#comment-4071</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/?p=2537#comment-4071</guid>
		<description>Kevin, I actually wanted to use your tree metaphor (I think I saw it on the World Literature Forum) when describing my reaction to this book.  Once my opinion started veering in one direction, I almost quit because I know my tendency to stick to my early judgment, for better or for worse.  But I stuck with it because it was enjoyable in parts, so I&#039;m glad I read it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin, I actually wanted to use your tree metaphor (I think I saw it on the World Literature Forum) when describing my reaction to this book.  Once my opinion started veering in one direction, I almost quit because I know my tendency to stick to my early judgment, for better or for worse.  But I stuck with it because it was enjoyable in parts, so I&#8217;m glad I read it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giller Prize 2009 longlist and the Shadow Jury &#171; KevinfromCanada</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2009/09/23/michael-crummey-galore/comment-page-1/#comment-4070</link>
		<dc:creator>Giller Prize 2009 longlist and the Shadow Jury &#171; KevinfromCanada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/?p=2537#comment-4070</guid>
		<description>[...] Shadow Giller judge Trevor Berrett has posted a review of Michael Crummey&#039;s Galore. It does a very good job of showing why Galore missed the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Shadow Giller judge Trevor Berrett has posted a review of Michael Crummey&#39;s Galore. It does a very good job of showing why Galore missed the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KevinfromCanada</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/2009/09/23/michael-crummey-galore/comment-page-1/#comment-4069</link>
		<dc:creator>KevinfromCanada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/?p=2537#comment-4069</guid>
		<description>Sorry I put you on to a disappointing book, Trevor -- the description had promise but the author obviously did not deliver.  I think that is a problem that extends beyond Crummey when authors are inspired by unconventional works like &lt;i&gt;One Hundred Years of Solitude&lt;/i&gt;.  Not only does the homage become too obvious, it starts to illustrate how uniquely good the original is.  And I too share the tendency that once you begin to notice this -- or another -- fault, other weaknesses become all too apparent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I put you on to a disappointing book, Trevor &#8212; the description had promise but the author obviously did not deliver.  I think that is a problem that extends beyond Crummey when authors are inspired by unconventional works like <i>One Hundred Years of Solitude</i>.  Not only does the homage become too obvious, it starts to illustrate how uniquely good the original is.  And I too share the tendency that once you begin to notice this &#8212; or another &#8212; fault, other weaknesses become all too apparent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
