The New Yorker Fiction Forum

New Yorker Original Cover

Click here to see what's happening in the fiction of each issue of The New Yorker.

Last Five Issues: ____________________________

Links & Stuff

I'm liking Ron Charles more and more and more, and this video review of Jonathan Franzen's Freedom makes just makes me giddy.

Over at Critical Mass, the blog for the NBCC, Wyatt Mason writes about Roth's "tenth, short, and perfect novel, The Ghost Writer." I agree with Mason; this is one great novel, and a great place to start if you're looking to get to know Roth. Here is my review. It wasn't my first Roth, but it is the book that made him one of my favorite writers of all time (if not my favorite).

This promises to get interesting. Anis Shivani of The Huffington Post has posted his list of the fifteen most overrated contemporary American authors. As usual, he makes some great points. Often when I see these, though, I think, "Okay, so they are bad. Now, tell me who is good -- and why the difference." Shivani promises to follow-up with the most underrated contemporary American writers. Followed with similar lists for American writers of the past century, and going further to include lists for the global writers.

Patricia Zohn interviews Jennifer Egan at The Huffington Post. I still think A Visit from the Goon Squad is one of the best books of the year.

New York Magazine has a nice look at independent bookstores in the City, which are rising "against all odds."

At Reading Matters, Kim has featured my blog on her Triple Choice Tuesday. My choices? The Ghost Writer, So Long, See You Tomorrow, and Butcher's Crossing. Pop on over and see my fresh, brief write-up of each title.

For Independence Day, the Huffington Post has a slide show of fifteen great independent publishers, featuring a few of my favorites -- Open Letter, Archipelago -- and a few I didn't know about. New Directions is a model of perfection, and I agree. I have stacks and stacks of books from these three presses, and I'm anxious to see what the others have to offer.

Michiko Kakutani's review of Jacob de Zoet is surprising in its lack of substance. It's mostly just a plot rehash (which I think gives away a bit too much). It's boring to read and insightless, where I usually enjoy her reviews even if I disagree (as I do here). I'm not saying my reviews are better, surely, but this is pretty poor for The New York Times daily and from a Pulitzer-winning critic.

In the new issue of The New Yorker, James Wood takes a look at The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet: "This is to argue not that David Mitchell should be more like Tolstoy or Conrad or Beckett but, curiously, that he might be more Mitchellian—that the reader wants a kind of moral or metaphysical pressure that is absent, and that has ceded all the ground to pure storytelling."

The Paris Review blog has a Q&A with Jennifer Egan, author of The Goon Squad, a piece of which was published in The New Yorker and discussed here.

Click here for the Never Let Me Go trailer. I didn't like the book as much as I hoped I would, but the trailer makes the film look good. ____________________________

2010 Book Awards

  • National Book Critics Circle Award
    • Winner: Hilary Mantel's Wolf Hall
  • PEN/Faulkner Award
    • Winner: Sherman Alexie's War Dances
  • Hemingway Foundation/PEN Award
    • Winner: Brigid Pasulka's A Long, Long Time Ago and Essentially True
  • Pulitzer Prize
  • Orange Prize
    • Winner: Barbara Kingsolver's The Lacuna
  • Man Booker Prize
    • Late July
    • Early September
    • Winner: October 12
  • Nobel Prize in Literature
    • Winner: October
  • Giller Prize
    • Longlist: September 20
    • Shortlist: October 5
    • Winner: November 9
  • National Book Award
    • Finalists: October 13
    • Winner: November
____________________________

2009 Book Awards

  • National Book Critics Circle Award
    • Winner: Roberto Bolano's 2666
  • Hemingway Foundation/PEN Award
    • Winner: Michael Dahlie's A Gentleman's Guide to Graceful Living
  • PEN/Faulkner Award
  • Orange Prize
    • Winner: Marilynne Robinson's Home
  • Man Booker Prize
    • Winner: Hilary Mantel's Wolf Hall
  • Nobel Prize in Literature
    • Winner: Herta Müller
  • National Book Award
    • Winner: Colum McCann's Let the Great World Spin

Tobias Wolff: The Barrack’s Thief

To continue on my project to read Tobias Wolff I chose his “other” ”novel,” The Barracks Thief (1984; PEN/Faulkner Award).  I put “other” in quotation marks because due to Wolff’s own repudiation of his first novel Ugly Rumors, this and Old School are considered the only two novels he’s written.  I put “novel” in quotation marks because this is really a novella, in some ways much more closely related to his short stories than to Old School.

The Barracks Thief begins by introducing Guy Bishop, basically a failure of a man (when Boeing was hiring anyone, he they still fired him), who will eventually cave in from the weight of an affair and leave his wife and two sons.  But in the first lines of the book, Wolff presents Guy from a contrasting perspective, in a moment of deep intimacy:

When his boys were young, Guy Bishop formed the habit of stopping in their room each night on his way to bed.  He would look down at them where they slept, and then he would sit in the rocking chair and listen to them breathe.  He was a man who had always gone from job to job, and, even since his marriage, woman to woman.  But when he sat in the dark between his two sleeping sons he felt no wish to move.

When he can no longer stay, he seems to most deeply regret the effect his leaving would have on his family, particularly on his wife — she’ll be so lonely without him, it will be very hard for her raising these two boys on her own, etc.

Philip did learn to get along without his father, mainly by despising him.  His mother held up, too, better than Guy Bishop had expected.  She caved in every couple of weeks or so, but most of the time she was cheerful in a determined way.  Only Keith lost heart.  He could not stop grieving.  He cried easily, sometimes for no apparent reason.  The two boys had been close; now, even in the act of comforting Keith, Philip looked at him from a distance.  There was only a year and a half between them but it began to seem like five or six.  One night, coming in from a party, he shook Keith awake with the idea of having a good talk, but after Keith woke up Philip went on shaking him and didn’t say a word.  One of the cats had been sleeping with Keith.  She arched her back, stared wide-eyed at Philip, and jumped to the floor.

“You’ve got to do your part,” Philip said.

Keith just looked at him.

“Damn you,” Philip said.  He pushed Keith back against the pillow.  “Cry,” he said.  “Go ahead, cry.”  He really did hope that Keith would cry, because he wanted to hold him.  But Keith shook his head.  He turned his face to the wall.  After that Keith kept his feelings to himself.

There is more emotion and narrative packed into the first few pages of The Barracks Thief than in many novels of any size.  The fracture in the family is swift, but we feel its depth in such moments when we see Philip just keep shaking Keith.  The effects of this hard childhood will reverberate through the book even though the book takes place primarily in a barracks where Philip is preparing for a tour in Vietnam.  Though we leave Guy Bishop, the first character we met, in a moment of intimacy, in the first sentence of the book, there is no sudden lurch in the narrative as it moves to other subjects; it flows smoothly from one moment to the next, the first pages echoing in the background.

After briefly watching Phillip and Keith grow older, we move to the barracks for the remainder of the novel, and get a shift in perspective as Phillip becomes our narrator.  As the new guy at the barracks Philip hesitates to be seen too much with the two other new guys, Lewis and Hubbard.  If they group together, they’ll forever be “the new guys.”  However, on the Fourth of July the three of them get placed on guard duty together.  This is not the typical assignment, though.  They drive several miles from the barracks to an ammunition dump.  They are to shoot to kill anyone who gets too close.  When their commanding officer leaves, we get to see them settle in and start to get familiar with each other.  Sometime during the night, a truck approaches, and a man gets out to speak with them:

“Okay, mister,” Hubbard said, “we’re all here.”

“Bet you’d rather be someplace else, too.”  He smiled at us.  “Terrible way to spend the holiday.”

None of us said anything.

 The man stopped smiling.  “We have a fire,” he said.  He pointed to the east, at a black cloud above the trees.  “It’s an annual event,” the man said.  “A couple of kids blew up a pipe full of matches.  Almost took their hands off.”  He turned his head and barked twice.  He might have been laughing or he might have been coughing.

“So what?” Lewis said.

The man looked at him, then at me.  I noticed for the first time that his eyes were blinking steadily.  “This isn’t the best place to be,” he said.

Thus begins a very tense interchange between the man, apparently trying to save their life from the fire, and the three new soldiers, trying to act their roles with their guns.  They surprise themselves, and are exhilarated by, their capacity for violence now that it is expected of them.  Naturally, after such a transformative event, the three new boys become much closer. 

The book again, after this additional intensely emotional episode, shifts gears.  Someone in the barracks begins stealing money from his fellows.  Its very disturbing that an individual within such a tight group could steal from those with him in these terrible circumstances.  It has a bad effect on everyone, but a particularly troubling effect on the new recruits.

Because the stealing was something new, and I was new, I felt accused by it.  No one said anything, but I felt in my heart that I was suspected.  It made me furious.  For the first time in my life I was spoiling for a fight, just waiting for someone to say something so I could swing at him and prove my innocence.  I noticed that Lewis carried himself the same way — swaggering and glaring at everyone all the time.  He looked ridiculous, but I thought I understood.  We were all breathing poison in and out.  It was a bad time.

In its ability to shift from one momentous scene to the next without throwing the reader, The Barracks Thief reminded me of Old School.  I love that Wolff lets his works go where they will.  Despite this appearing loose, though, it is actually a very tightly structured novel.  In it we get a variety of situations dealing with a variety of characters, including a prostitute I haven’t even introduced here.

Groups come together and break down, and in breaking down we see that they were never really on the same page at all.  But those two forces — the ones that pull people together and the ones that drive people apart — are wonderfully rendered in this fascinating novella.

6 comments to Tobias Wolff: The Barrack’s Thief

  • Interesting theme. I like the fact that out of all the seemingly “loose” events, Wolff chooses the thief incident for the title. Andre Dubus is a favorite of mine, so his blurb on the cover is incentive enough to buy this. Thanks for the review.

  • I saw the blurb, Wilson, but I’m going to show my ignorance by saying I don’t even know who Andre Dubus is. Now, his blurb (and your comment, mostly) is incentive to find out.

    By the way, I’m not sure why your comment here had to go up for moderation again. Usually once I’ve allowed someone to comment, they can comment without that step for ever more. Perhaps you changed some of your sign-in information — I notice that in this comment your avatar showed up where it didn’t in the last.

  • I updated my avatar, so that’s probably why I had to be moderated again. In The Bedroom is a short collection of Dubus’ stories that may be a good introduction. The movie by the same name is based on his story “Killings.”

  • I thought In the Bedroom was excellent! Sounds like I should get some Dubus.

  • I love his works. I need to add this one to my TBR pile.

    These barracks – are they in the US or Vietnam?

  • You will love this one too then, Isabel. The barracks are in the U.S. I think, though I may be wrong, somewhere down south, so in your general neck of the woods.

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>