The New Yorker Fiction Forum

New Yorker Original Cover

Click here to see what's happening in the fiction of each issue of The New Yorker.

Last Five Issues: ____________________________

Links & Stuff

I'm liking Ron Charles more and more and more, and this video review of Jonathan Franzen's Freedom makes just makes me giddy.

Over at Critical Mass, the blog for the NBCC, Wyatt Mason writes about Roth's "tenth, short, and perfect novel, The Ghost Writer." I agree with Mason; this is one great novel, and a great place to start if you're looking to get to know Roth. Here is my review. It wasn't my first Roth, but it is the book that made him one of my favorite writers of all time (if not my favorite).

This promises to get interesting. Anis Shivani of The Huffington Post has posted his list of the fifteen most overrated contemporary American authors. As usual, he makes some great points. Often when I see these, though, I think, "Okay, so they are bad. Now, tell me who is good -- and why the difference." Shivani promises to follow-up with the most underrated contemporary American writers. Followed with similar lists for American writers of the past century, and going further to include lists for the global writers.

Patricia Zohn interviews Jennifer Egan at The Huffington Post. I still think A Visit from the Goon Squad is one of the best books of the year.

New York Magazine has a nice look at independent bookstores in the City, which are rising "against all odds."

At Reading Matters, Kim has featured my blog on her Triple Choice Tuesday. My choices? The Ghost Writer, So Long, See You Tomorrow, and Butcher's Crossing. Pop on over and see my fresh, brief write-up of each title.

For Independence Day, the Huffington Post has a slide show of fifteen great independent publishers, featuring a few of my favorites -- Open Letter, Archipelago -- and a few I didn't know about. New Directions is a model of perfection, and I agree. I have stacks and stacks of books from these three presses, and I'm anxious to see what the others have to offer.

Michiko Kakutani's review of Jacob de Zoet is surprising in its lack of substance. It's mostly just a plot rehash (which I think gives away a bit too much). It's boring to read and insightless, where I usually enjoy her reviews even if I disagree (as I do here). I'm not saying my reviews are better, surely, but this is pretty poor for The New York Times daily and from a Pulitzer-winning critic.

In the new issue of The New Yorker, James Wood takes a look at The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet: "This is to argue not that David Mitchell should be more like Tolstoy or Conrad or Beckett but, curiously, that he might be more Mitchellian—that the reader wants a kind of moral or metaphysical pressure that is absent, and that has ceded all the ground to pure storytelling."

The Paris Review blog has a Q&A with Jennifer Egan, author of The Goon Squad, a piece of which was published in The New Yorker and discussed here.

Click here for the Never Let Me Go trailer. I didn't like the book as much as I hoped I would, but the trailer makes the film look good. ____________________________

2010 Book Awards

  • National Book Critics Circle Award
    • Winner: Hilary Mantel's Wolf Hall
  • PEN/Faulkner Award
    • Winner: Sherman Alexie's War Dances
  • Hemingway Foundation/PEN Award
    • Winner: Brigid Pasulka's A Long, Long Time Ago and Essentially True
  • Pulitzer Prize
  • Orange Prize
    • Winner: Barbara Kingsolver's The Lacuna
  • Man Booker Prize
    • Late July
    • Early September
    • Winner: October 12
  • Nobel Prize in Literature
    • Winner: October
  • Giller Prize
    • Longlist: September 20
    • Shortlist: October 5
    • Winner: November 9
  • National Book Award
    • Finalists: October 13
    • Winner: November
____________________________

2009 Book Awards

  • National Book Critics Circle Award
    • Winner: Roberto Bolano's 2666
  • Hemingway Foundation/PEN Award
    • Winner: Michael Dahlie's A Gentleman's Guide to Graceful Living
  • PEN/Faulkner Award
  • Orange Prize
    • Winner: Marilynne Robinson's Home
  • Man Booker Prize
    • Winner: Hilary Mantel's Wolf Hall
  • Nobel Prize in Literature
    • Winner: Herta Müller
  • National Book Award
    • Winner: Colum McCann's Let the Great World Spin

J.G. Farrell: Troubles

I’m afraid I won’t be able to review any more of the Lost Booker shortlist before the voting period ends on Friday — but at least we got that extra week, right?  I still don’t think the public was given nearly enough time to read and properly vote on the winner, especially when there are a couple of long, dense works that should be strong contenders.  Troubles (1970) was one of those long, dense works.  It took me quite a long time to read.  Some of it was because I have been incredibly busy with work, taking away my nights and weekends to the detriment of my reading and blogging, among other things.  However, it wasn’t only the work that made this a long read.  Troubles, though a pleasure, is a heavy historical work dealing with a very complicated mess.  In a matter of pages, many things can happen, each with its parallel meaning, so I ceded to the book’s demand and slowed my pace.  I’m glad I did, too, because in the end I was happy to have spent so much time with this book on my mind.

Troubles is part of Farrell’s Empire Trilogy, books that take a snapshot of the British Empire in various states of decay.  Also included is The Singapore Grip, which I haven’t read yet, and The Siege of Krishnapur, one of my favorite Booker winners.  Troublestakes us to Ireland in 1919.  Major Brendan Archer has survived France in the Great War and is on his way to Ireland to meet up with his fiancée, Angela, an Anglo-Irish daughter of the once-wealthy Edward Spencer.  The Spencers own the Majestic Hotel in Kilnalough.  Just a generation or two ago, the hotel was a thriving, luxurious abode of the gentry.  In 1919 it has a few remaining elderly guests whose presence brings the past more sharply in relief; they feel like ghosts of a better past still haunting the grounds.  Here is how Farrell introduces the Majestic; he devotes to it his first lines in the novel:

In those days the Majestic was still standing in Kilnalough at the very end of a slim peninsula covered with dead pines leaning here and there at odd angles.  At that time there were probably yachts there too during the summer since the hotel held a regatta every July.  These yachts would have been beached on one or other of the sandy crescents that curved out towards the hotel on each side of the peninsula.  But now both pines and yachts have floated away and one day the high tide may very well meet over the narrowest part of the peninsula, made narrower by erosion.  As for the regatta, for some reason it was discontinued years ago, before the Spencers took over the management of the place.  And a few years later still the Majestic itself followed the boats and preceded the pines into oblivion by burning to the ground — but by that time, of course, the place was in such a state of disrepair that it hardly mattered.

The state of disrepair is obvious to the Major when he arrives.  He is surprised to find rooms that haven’t been touched in years, rooms where cats are thriving, and eventually, trying to find a suitable room, he has inhabited a good number of the Majestic’s space.  As he arrives, a bit disoriented, the Major is surprised not to have Angela waiting for him.  He meets her father, her brother Ripon, and many more inhabitants before encountering Angela as she sits taking tea.  She had written him so many letters, but he is surprised to find she is not at all how she was in the letters or indeed as she was when they first met.  Not that that meeting had been anything impressive:

They had kissed behind a screen of leaves and, reaching out to steady himself, he had put his hand down firmly on a cactus, which had rendered many of his parting words insincere.

Still, over the course of the years since that kiss, he felt confident that they were engaged.  One of the best features of Farrell’s writing, however, is how he creates ghosts in the narrative.  The Major rarely meets with Angela throughout the course of the entire book.  And there are other ghosts in the narrative.  First is Sarah Devlin, one of Angela’s friends and the woman with whom the Major will fall in love.  Where Angela is Anglo-Irish, Sarah is pure Irish and a Catholic:

“Angela told you all that, of course.  But you’ve forgotten the most important thing.”

“What’s that?”

“The fact that I’m a Catholic.  Yes, I can see that she told you but that you regard it as a fact too shameful to mention.  Or perhaps you regard it as good manners not to mention such an affliction.”

“What absolute nonsense!”

“Pay no attention, Sarah got out of bed the wrong side as usual.”

“Be quiet, Ripon!  It’s not nonsense at all.  Ripon’s father calls us ‘fish-eaters’ and ‘Holy Romans’ and so on.  So does Ripon.  So will you, Major, when you’re among the ‘quality.’  In fact, you’ll become a member of the ‘quality’ yourself, high and mighty, too good for the rest of us.”

“I hope not to be so bigoted,” said the Major smiling.  “Surely there’s no need to abandon one’s reason simply because one is in Ireland.”

Though the Major falls in love with Sarah, and though we do encounter her every once in a while, she still is, for much of the book, an absence felt.  Months go by without their meeting, and she haunts the Major all the time.  He even finds a warm room full of sheets in which he retires to imagine her with him.  Farrell’s humour can be highlighted (the whole book is full of comedy) by looking at a few passages with the Major and Sarah.  Here he the omniscient narrator speaking about the hopeless Major:

Until now, incredible though it may seem, the Major had never considered that love, like war, is best conducted with experience of tactics.  His instinct helped him a little.  It warned him, for instance, against unconditional surrender. (“Do with me as you see fit, Sarah.”)  With Sarah he somehow knew that that would not work.  He was learning slowly, by  experience.  Next time he had a love affair he would do much better.  But to the love-drugged Major that was not much consolation.

And here is a bit of the comedy of manners that comes out:

Although his indifference to her had been amply demonstrated, the Major still could not prevent himself from haunting the couple, in the hope of getting further opportunities to demonstrate it.

Of course, the book has a very dark side.  There is a lot of destruction going on and a lot of death offstage (and onstage, periodically).  Which brings up another conspicuous absence: the Sinn Feiners, the rebel Irish who are, according to Edward Spencer, destroying the country.  Or, according to others, the Patriots who will settle for nothing less than home rule.  There are frequent tales of a Sinn Feiner shooting a cop or blowing up something, but we almost never see one.  And even when there is a group of them present, it is written in such a way that we can feel them but not see them.  It’s wondrous how Farrell does this.

In this context, Troubles becomes an intricate allegory of the British Empire in Ireland.  The Majestic, it is obvious from page one, represents the Empire itself.  But the Major’s motives for being at the Majestic are tied to the historical context.  The cats, the bamboo, the statues, the sea: all come together in surprising ways.

But, if allegory scares anyone, Troubles is also a great historical read.  Farrell is not obviously allegorical, as some are.  His narrative goes on naturally and one need never look for symbols to understand the tragedy that is occurring in the lives, historical and personal, in 1919 Ireland.

3 comments to J.G. Farrell: Troubles

  • I read Troubles some years ago after I discovered The Siege of Krishnapur but I didn’t enjoy it as much. One day I’ll get to The Singapore Grip which has been on my TBR for far too long.
    Lisa

  • I’m not sure which I enjoyed more, Lisa. I think I may have “enjoyed” The Siege of Krishnapur more, but I think Troubles was the better book. Not sure if that makes sense or not . . .

    I haven’t had The Singapore Grip on my list before finishing Troubles but it’s there now!

  • Matt

    Thanks for this great review!

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>