Autumn
by Ali Smith (2016)
Hamish Hamilton (2016)
258 pp

Autumn

Here’s an old story so new that it’s still in the middle of happening, writing itself right now with no knowledge of where or how it’ll end.

Ali Smith’s Autumn has claim to be the first Brexit based novel, published less than four months after the United Kingdom voted, on June 23rd, to leave the European Union in a referendum, surprising most pundits and exposing new political fault lines that cut across the usual left / right divide.

Smith’s previous novel, How to both, swept the United Kingdom’s literary slate in 2014, winning the Goldsmiths Prize, the Costa Novel of the Year, and the Bailey’s Prize, while being shortlisted for the Folio Prize and the Man Booker Prize, an unusual feat given the diverse criteria of each award. It also came with a distinctive feature: written in two halves set 500 years apart, 50% of the copies were printed with the present day story first, and 50% started with the 15th century part.

The ability of her publishers to accommodate this unusual request so quickly inspired Smith to adapt Autumn, a novel long-planned as the first in a quartet on the seasons, to incorporate the emerging events.

Her publishers have certainly delivered with the physical book. The hardback cover is a rich autumnal reddish-brown and comes with a wrap-around of Early November Tunnel by David Hockney.

The story starts in late June, days after the Brexit vote, opening with, “It was the worst of times, it was the worst of times” (Smith hardly disguises her personal view on the E.U. vote) in a conscious echo of Dicken’s A Tale of Two Cities, and takes us up to November 2016. Tackled now, the reader experiences the present day world of the novel as he or she reads it, both current affairs and the changing of the seasons.

October’s a blink of an eye. The apples weighing down the tree a minute ago are gone and the tree’s leaves are yellow and thinning. A frost has snapped millions of trees all across the country into brightness. The ones that aren’t evergreen are a combination of beautiful and tawdry, red orange gold the leaves, then brown, then down.

The days are unexpectedly mild. It doesn’t feel that far from summer, not really, if it weren’t for the underbite of the day, the lacy creep of the dark and damp at its edges, the plants calm in the folding themselves away, the beads of the condensation on the webstrings hung between things.

On the warm days it feels wrong, so many leaves falling.

But the nights are cool to cold.

Elisabeth Demand (the non-standard spelling of her first name, and the unusual surname both feature in Smith’s, at times, overdone word play) is 32 years old in 2016, a “no-fixed-hours casual contract lecturer at a university in London” concerned personally for the loss of E.U. funding as well as what the Brexit vote says about her society.

She has a long-standing and deep friendship with Daniel Gluck, 70 years her senior and now in an “increased sleep period” in a care home, having first met him when, aged nine, she moved in next door. The novel takes us back through the history of their unusual friendship.

Gluck himself reveals little of his own story, although from what is said we can infer that his adored and brilliant younger sister (“he now knows for sure that when she grows up she is going to be a great force in the world, an important thinker, a changer of things”) was lost in the Holocaust in her early 20s and that Gluck himself, although safe in England, was interred with his German father.

Gluck also found brief fame as writer of an early 1960s one-hit wonder, Summer Brother, Autumn Sister, inspired by Keatsian imagery and his own sister, and through that becomes involved in the pop-art and music scene, meeting the, unreciprocated, love of his life, the real life British female pop-artist and actress Pauline Body, dubbed the “Wimbledon Bardot.”

Boty’s true story, as told by Smith, is in many respect the novel’s most interesting.  Renowed for her stunning beauty, her artistic contribution was often overlooked.  A write up of her work in Scene magazine in November 1962, intended to be supportive, read:

Actresses often have tiny brains. Painters often have large beards. Imagine a brainy actress who is also a painter and also a blonde, and you have PAULINE BOTY.

And after her early death, itself a tragic and fascinating story, Boty’s work was largely forgotten. Elisabeth as a fictional character, and Ali Smith as the author, play an important role in bringing her back to our attention.

Boty’s most famous painting, now lost, was Scandal 63, based on (a variation of) the famous Christine Keeler photograph by Lewis Morley. This brings the story neatly on to the 1963 Profumo Scandal, where the British defense minister and a Soviet attaché shared a high-class call-girl lover, Keeler, leading to the resignation of the minister and indirectly the retirement of the Prime Minister. The scandal rocked the public’s trust in politicians, and Smith draws a direct link between that and the political mistruths on both sides of the rather demeaning 2016 referendum campaign.

Gluck’s relationship with Boty verges on that of an elder brother, and one cannot help but conclude that Boty represents a substitute for his sister, as, 30 years later, does Elisabeth.

The friendship between the young Elisabeth and a man in his 80s is replayed in the novel in conversations involving word-play and deep discussions on the nature of stories and fiction that don’t ring entirely true, at least as far as the, in this passage 11-year-old, girl’s contribution is concerned:

The word gymkhana, Daniel said, is a wonderful word, a word grown from several languages.

Words don’t get grown, Elisabeth said.

They do, Daniel said.

Words aren’t plants, Elisabeth said.

Words are themselves organisms, Daniel said.

Oregano-isms, Elisabeth said.

Herbal and verbal, Daniel said.

But we are later told Elisabeth herself doesn’t remember the conversations at all today, and Daniel in the present day is largely lost in dreams, so I came to think of Elisabeth’s side of the verbal sparring as largely imagined by Daniel in terms of how his verbally brilliant sister once spoke to him.

Daniel does inspire in Elisabeth a love of books, and she returns the favor as he lies dying, reading to him from the key texts on which the novel is based, Keats’s poems, Brave New World, The Tempest (from which Huxley took his title), and Ovid’s Metamorphoses.

The Brexit vote itself at times feels a little shoe-horned in.  It is most memorably captured in an extended chapter, of which a brief part reads:

All across the country, people felt it was the wrong thing. All across the country, people felt it was the right thing. All across the country, people felt they’d really lost. All across the country, people felt they’d really won. All across the country people felt they’d done the right thing and other people had done the wrong thing. All across the country, people looked up Google: what is EU? All across the country people looked up Google move to Scotland. All across the country, people looked up Google Irish passport applications. All across the country, people called each other cunts. All across the country, people felt unsafe. All across the country, people were laughing their heads off. All across the country, people felt legitimized. All across the country, people felt bereaved and sick.

But throughout the present day parts of the story, the shadow of the vote hovers. The intolerance, on all sides, and the lack of mutual comprehension is best expressed by Elisabeth’s mother:

I’m tired of the news. I’m tired of the way it makes things spectacular that aren’t, and deals so simplistically with what’s truly appalling. I’m tired of the vitriol. I’m tired of the anger. I’m tired of the meanness. I’m tired of the selfishness. I’m tired of how we’re doing nothing to stop it. I’m tired of how we’re encouraging it. I’m tired of the violence there is and I’m tired of the violence that’s on its way, that’s coming, that hasn’t happened yet. I’m tired of liars. I’m tired of sanctified liars. I’m tired of how these liars have let this happen. I’m tired of having to wonder whether they did it out of stupidity or did it on purpose. I’m tired of lying governments. I’m tired of people not caring whether they’re being lied to any more. I’m tired of being made to feel this fearful. I’m tired of animosity. I’m tired of pusillanimosity.

I don’t think that’s actually a word, Elisabeth says.

I’m tired of not knowing the right words, her mother says.

This is a lengthy review because Smith has packed a lot in what is actually quite a short novel. At one point, Elisabeth finds her mind drifting over various images from the preceding days: some cow parsley in the background of a TV show about antique bargain hunters, flowers painted over xenophobic graffiti on a house, and Pauline Boty’s painting of Jean-Paul Belmondo. She wonders if she can pull this together: “The cow parsley. The painted flowers. Boty’s sheer unadulterated reds in the re-image-ing of the image. Put it together and what have you got? Anything useful?”

Playing devil’s advocate, one could argue that the novel has a similar issue.  Smith has taken her original idea of an Autumnal novel, her discovery of the life and artwork of Pauline Boty, her research into the Profumo scandal, and the current events around Brexit, and put them together in a slightly uneasy mix.

One key theme of the novel is how, in today’s society, times and current affairs move so fast that they leave no trace. Elisabeth listens to the news “to catch up on the usual huge changes there’ve been in the last half hour,” and referring to the real-life killing of the British MP Jo Cox by someone angered by her support for Syrian refugees:

Someone killed an MP, she tells Daniel’s back as she struggles to keep up. A man shot her dead and came at her with a knife. Like shooting her wouldn’t be enough. But it’s old news now. Once it would have been a year’s worth of news. But news right now is like a flock of speeded-up sheep running off the side of a cliff.

That very effect highlights one key weakness of the novel. The novel is so much based on its time and place I wonder how it will age and travel.

While the wider social forces behind the Brexit vote would certainly resonate, e.g., with the U.S. Presidential election or indeed rise of populist parties across Europe, specifics such as the extended, and amusing, story of Elisabeth’s struggles with the Post Office’s hapless Check and Send passport service and their incestuous relationship with Snappy Snaps, may not.

The effect of reading it almost in real-time, in today’s United Kingdom, is very effective, but the novel will, I suspect, read very differently in ten years’ time, perhaps even next year.

Indeed like autumn leaves, the brilliant colors of Smith’s prose may also mark its ultimately short life expectancy.

Highly recommended, but best read while its colors blaze.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Mookse and the Gripes on Patreon!
By |2017-07-29T14:41:55+00:00November 2nd, 2016|Categories: Ali Smith, Book Reviews|Tags: , , , |11 Comments

11 Comments

  1. Tredynas Days November 3, 2016 at 4:00 am

    Thanks for this, Paul. I like the honesty of the reservations you express – too many reviews are just hagiography. I’m keen to read this, having enjoyed much of AS’s work. That point about including transitory, contemporary events is pertinent: just been reading again about J Austen’s alleged omission of such events from her novels – not true, it’s just that she doesn’t place them centre-stage; but Mansfield Park couldn’t exist without colonial greed and European wars (etc). Maybe AS would have been better off adopting the fictional essay collection structure of ‘Artful’, which perhaps avoided the difficulties you identify here. Still want to read ‘Autumn’, though, which is a sign of a good review! Thanks.

  2. Paul Fulcher November 3, 2016 at 8:51 am

    Thanks. And very interesting point re how she could have perhaps chosen a different approach or fictional form.

    And for the avoidance of doubt, I would certainly recommend the book. It’s strengths comfortably outweigh its flaws. But I do wonder how it will age, indeed if it may look a little out of date even by next year’s award season.

  3. Lee Monks November 3, 2016 at 2:35 pm

    Fine review, Paul: I’m just reading this, will comment further once I’m done. Like Simon, I’m a Smith fan, and would read anything of hers. She’s one of about 20 authors I purely love the voice of enough to want to pick their latest up.

  4. fulcherkim December 9, 2016 at 5:58 am

    It was interesting to read in her Artful a quote from the narrator of Juan Pablo Villalobos’s Down the Rabbit Hole:

    “Books don’t have anything in them about the present, only the past and the future. This is one of the biggest defects of books. Someone should invent a book that tells you what’s happening at this moment, as you read.”

    Autumn was a partial attempt to do something like that. One reservation I had in the review that “The effect of reading it almost in real-time, in today’s United Kingdom, is very effective, but the novel will, I suspect, read very differently in ten years’ time, perhaps even next year.”

    I was a little too optimistic on that – we now have a novel that runs into November 2016, a narrator who concerns itself with political issues, but she fails to mention President Trump.

  5. David December 9, 2016 at 6:12 pm

    Fulcherkim, this is an extreme example of the very reason I ten not to read many new books. What is the “this could be the greatest novel of all time” when it is published becomes the “it’s one of many good books worth reading” a couple of years later then the “what was all the fuss about” a couple of more years after that. So if I wait five or more years and people are still saying “you really must read this book” then I know it might be for real.
    .
    Besides, there are more than a lifetime of books worth reading published in the several hundred years before I was born I still have to get to. So a book published in 2016 just has to get in line. That it becomes out of date before 2017 arrives is all the more reason to make new books wait. I make exceptions for authors I already know and love and for plot book descriptions that seem particularly exciting, but those are the exceptions.
    .
    The last two books I finished were published in 1980 and 1918. Books from 2016 worth reading will still be around in 35 to 100 years. Some of them I will even find tome to get around to reading. Eventually.

  6. fulcherkim December 10, 2016 at 1:04 pm

    Sensible approach – although I think Smith here in a way has reacted to just that by creating an excellent book that almost has to be read in 2016 or not at all.

  7. David December 10, 2016 at 4:10 pm

    Well, Fulcherkim, if food can have a best before date and still be delicious, I suppose a book can have an expiry date and be great too. I’m just not sure I like that idea.

  8. fulcherkim December 10, 2016 at 4:41 pm

    Agreed – just thought it was an interesting approach in that what seemed like a flaw when I read and reviewed it, seemed like it may have been deliberate when I subsequently read Artful.

  9. […] vote, and the story runs up through last November. It was published in the U.K. in October, causing reviewers to marvel that by the time they’d finished reading the book, the action in it had caught up with their […]

  10. 1streading July 29, 2017 at 6:22 pm

    One way to discover how it might last would be to read Gordon Burns’ Born Yesterday – the first novel I thought of when Smith said she intended to write a self-consciously contemporary novel.
    What concerned me about Autumn was the way the reader is encouraged by Smith’s clever characters to laugh at the less clever, anonymous characters in menial jobs. Ironically one of the causes of Brexit in the first place!

  11. fulcherkim July 30, 2017 at 1:57 am

    Grant, thanks for the point towards Born Yesterday – I’d actually overlooked that one.

    Autumn is a think a little different in that one feature – it can be a good point or a weakness depending on your view – is that much of the novel could exist without the Brexit angle, indeed it feels a little inserted at times. Fans of Smith who’ve re-read the book more recently tell me it actually holds up better now when the reader naturally focuses less on the Brexit parts and more e.g. the Pauline Boty story.

    As for her clever characters laughing at the less clever, anonymous characters in menial jobs – well, as you say, if that was part of Brexit then the novel should show that aspect of behaviour. I think the book captures well the mutual incomprehension – on both sides – that the Brexit vote revealed, in particular in the immediate aftermath of the vote. If Smith’s characters come across as feeling “how dare these people do that to my comfortable life”, well that is how a lot of people (guilty as charge) felt.

    For a more direct and focused treatment of Brexit alone – and a more balanced dialogue between the two sides – Pereine Press commissioned Anthony Cartwright to write The Cut. It didn’t work for me at all but I know several fellow GR reviewers who liked it a lot.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.