<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: National Book Critics Circle Award</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/nbcc-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews</link>
	<description>Book reviews of contemporary literary fiction and modern classics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:22:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/nbcc-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-5133</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?page_id=968#comment-5133</guid>
		<description>There is &lt;em&gt;The Tanners&lt;/em&gt; that I think should be on the list, but I don&#039;t think it will be.  Not only is it somewhat under the radar, but I doubt that the year after giving the award posthumously to Roberto Bolaño (only four years&#039; dead) they would then give it to Robert Walser (54 years&#039; dead).  I&#039;m not sure that&#039;s the kind of thing they have in mind for this award, though the criteria don&#039;t prohibit such a winner as far as I can tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is <em>The Tanners</em> that I think should be on the list, but I don&#8217;t think it will be.  Not only is it somewhat under the radar, but I doubt that the year after giving the award posthumously to Roberto Bolaño (only four years&#8217; dead) they would then give it to Robert Walser (54 years&#8217; dead).  I&#8217;m not sure that&#8217;s the kind of thing they have in mind for this award, though the criteria don&#8217;t prohibit such a winner as far as I can tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/nbcc-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-5128</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 13:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?page_id=968#comment-5128</guid>
		<description>Last year wasn&#039;t a good year for me and current American literature.  I think I only read a couple of books by American authors (&lt;em&gt;Lark &amp; Termite&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;The Humbling&lt;/em&gt;), I completely stayed away from the Booker finalists (though I have almost all of them on hand to read eventually -- &lt;em&gt;The Glass Room&lt;/em&gt; arrived in the mail yesterday courtesy of Other Press), and I can&#039;t think of a piece of translated literature that is quite on the scale of, say, &lt;em&gt;Austerlitz&lt;/em&gt; or &lt;em&gt;2666&lt;/em&gt; (maybe &lt;em&gt;Your Face Tomorrow&lt;/em&gt; Vol. 3?  But that&#039;s the third part of an ambitious trilogy.  Maybe &lt;em&gt;Ghosts&lt;/em&gt;?  But that&#039;s rather idiosyncratic.).  

I don&#039;t see a work of translated fiction being on this list this year.  I can&#039;t think of one that was widely reviewed by the critics that make up the NBCC.  I might have a blind spot this morning, but I can&#039;t think of a major translated work that was published by a major publisher, and, sadly, those are the ones that get the attention of this group.

From the general admiration, I can see &lt;em&gt;Wolf Hall&lt;/em&gt; being a finalist here, and I can see &lt;em&gt;Let the Great World Spin&lt;/em&gt; on the list, though I&#039;ve read neither.  I can also see &lt;em&gt;Lark &amp; Termite&lt;/em&gt; on the list, which would be a surprise to me (it wasn&#039;t a surprise that it was a National Book Award finalist) because it just doesn&#039;t seem like a NBCC award winner.  I would be more surprised to see &lt;em&gt;That Old Cape Magic&lt;/em&gt; on the list, just because I get the sense that people read it comparing it to Russo&#039;s other work and not so much to other books written in 2009.  I cannot see &lt;em&gt;The Humbling&lt;/em&gt; on the list -- too weird, and not loved by half the critics in the circle anyway.

Last year I hadn&#039;t heard of &lt;em&gt;Olive Kitteridge&lt;/em&gt; or &lt;em&gt;The Battle of Trenchmouth Taggert&lt;/em&gt;, and this year I feel even more in the dark.

Thanks for the thoughts, Kevin.  Hopefully some others will join in the discussion and give some light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year wasn&#8217;t a good year for me and current American literature.  I think I only read a couple of books by American authors (<em>Lark &#038; Termite</em> and <em>The Humbling</em>), I completely stayed away from the Booker finalists (though I have almost all of them on hand to read eventually &#8212; <em>The Glass Room</em> arrived in the mail yesterday courtesy of Other Press), and I can&#8217;t think of a piece of translated literature that is quite on the scale of, say, <em>Austerlitz</em> or <em>2666</em> (maybe <em>Your Face Tomorrow</em> Vol. 3?  But that&#8217;s the third part of an ambitious trilogy.  Maybe <em>Ghosts</em>?  But that&#8217;s rather idiosyncratic.).  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see a work of translated fiction being on this list this year.  I can&#8217;t think of one that was widely reviewed by the critics that make up the NBCC.  I might have a blind spot this morning, but I can&#8217;t think of a major translated work that was published by a major publisher, and, sadly, those are the ones that get the attention of this group.</p>
<p>From the general admiration, I can see <em>Wolf Hall</em> being a finalist here, and I can see <em>Let the Great World Spin</em> on the list, though I&#8217;ve read neither.  I can also see <em>Lark &#038; Termite</em> on the list, which would be a surprise to me (it wasn&#8217;t a surprise that it was a National Book Award finalist) because it just doesn&#8217;t seem like a NBCC award winner.  I would be more surprised to see <em>That Old Cape Magic</em> on the list, just because I get the sense that people read it comparing it to Russo&#8217;s other work and not so much to other books written in 2009.  I cannot see <em>The Humbling</em> on the list &#8212; too weird, and not loved by half the critics in the circle anyway.</p>
<p>Last year I hadn&#8217;t heard of <em>Olive Kitteridge</em> or <em>The Battle of Trenchmouth Taggert</em>, and this year I feel even more in the dark.</p>
<p>Thanks for the thoughts, Kevin.  Hopefully some others will join in the discussion and give some light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KevinfromCanada</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/nbcc-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-5118</link>
		<dc:creator>KevinfromCanada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 22:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?page_id=968#comment-5118</guid>
		<description>With this year&#039;s shortlists in all categories due for announcement on Jan. 23, I thought we should make this post active, at least on the fiction list.  I am always behind on reading U.S. fiction, but I do have three that I want to see on the list:

1.  That Old Cape Magic; Richard Russo
2.  In Other Rooms, Other Wonders; Daniel Mueenuddin
3.  Both Ways Is The Only Way I Want It; Maile Meloy

I&#039;ve reviewed the first two and a review on Meloy will be up within a week.

That means there are some I have read that I don&#039;t think belong on the list -- Lorrie Moore most notably, although Colum McCann&#039;s Let the Great World Spin would be another (and I would not be upset if this one made the list).  And I haven&#039;t read Lark and Termite, which I know you liked and which did attract a lot of support.

I think in many ways this award is the most representative of the U.S. based awards (and we should note the broadest based since it has no citizenship restrictions).  I do think for readers looking for readable books, it does produce the best list.

So, Trevor, your choices?  Since the NBCC often features translated works, I&#039;m definitely looking to see what you have to say.  You are my expert on works in translation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With this year&#8217;s shortlists in all categories due for announcement on Jan. 23, I thought we should make this post active, at least on the fiction list.  I am always behind on reading U.S. fiction, but I do have three that I want to see on the list:</p>
<p>1.  That Old Cape Magic; Richard Russo<br />
2.  In Other Rooms, Other Wonders; Daniel Mueenuddin<br />
3.  Both Ways Is The Only Way I Want It; Maile Meloy</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve reviewed the first two and a review on Meloy will be up within a week.</p>
<p>That means there are some I have read that I don&#8217;t think belong on the list &#8212; Lorrie Moore most notably, although Colum McCann&#8217;s Let the Great World Spin would be another (and I would not be upset if this one made the list).  And I haven&#8217;t read Lark and Termite, which I know you liked and which did attract a lot of support.</p>
<p>I think in many ways this award is the most representative of the U.S. based awards (and we should note the broadest based since it has no citizenship restrictions).  I do think for readers looking for readable books, it does produce the best list.</p>
<p>So, Trevor, your choices?  Since the NBCC often features translated works, I&#8217;m definitely looking to see what you have to say.  You are my expert on works in translation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/nbcc-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1417</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?page_id=968#comment-1417</guid>
		<description>Roberto Bolano&#039;s &lt;em&gt;2666&lt;/em&gt; has won the 2008 NBCC Award for fiction.

That means that both the 2008 National Book Award and the 2008 NBCC Award went to gigantic, convoluted, quasi-unreadable novels.  Definitely awarding ambition this year, both the authors and the readers who want to read the books!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roberto Bolano&#8217;s <em>2666</em> has won the 2008 NBCC Award for fiction.</p>
<p>That means that both the 2008 National Book Award and the 2008 NBCC Award went to gigantic, convoluted, quasi-unreadable novels.  Definitely awarding ambition this year, both the authors and the readers who want to read the books!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/nbcc-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1414</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?page_id=968#comment-1414</guid>
		<description>The NBCC awards ceremony is going on as I write this, but so far I have found no announcements.  And now I&#039;m on my way out the door.  So . . . looking forward to the winners!

By the way, just started &lt;em&gt;This Republic of Suffering&lt;/em&gt;, a nonfiction book that is a finalist for the NBCC and was a finalist for the National Book Award.  Looks like a good year for nonfiction if books like this aren&#039;t winning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NBCC awards ceremony is going on as I write this, but so far I have found no announcements.  And now I&#8217;m on my way out the door.  So . . . looking forward to the winners!</p>
<p>By the way, just started <em>This Republic of Suffering</em>, a nonfiction book that is a finalist for the NBCC and was a finalist for the National Book Award.  Looks like a good year for nonfiction if books like this aren&#8217;t winning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KevinfromCanada</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/nbcc-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1409</link>
		<dc:creator>KevinfromCanada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?page_id=968#comment-1409</guid>
		<description>The more I thought about it the more disappointed that I was with this list.  I did take another look at &lt;i&gt;Lazarus&lt;/i&gt; but didn&#039;t read it -- after my first failed effort, it looked just too much like a chore, as opposed to reading books that I really did want to read.  I couldn&#039;t finish &lt;i&gt;The Savage Detectives&lt;/i&gt; which meant &lt;i&gt;2666&lt;/i&gt; had about nine strikes against it.  So I too would probably opt for &lt;i&gt;Home&lt;/i&gt;, even though I was pretty lukewarm about it.  Given some very good books I did read that were eligible -- &lt;i&gt;Unaccustomed Earth, Telex from Cuba&lt;/i&gt; and, yes, &lt;i&gt;Netherland&lt;/i&gt; -- not too mention all the foreign-originated work that qualifies -- that seems to be a disappointing choice.  Let&#039;s hope the Pulitzer is more interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more I thought about it the more disappointed that I was with this list.  I did take another look at <i>Lazarus</i> but didn&#8217;t read it &#8212; after my first failed effort, it looked just too much like a chore, as opposed to reading books that I really did want to read.  I couldn&#8217;t finish <i>The Savage Detectives</i> which meant <i>2666</i> had about nine strikes against it.  So I too would probably opt for <i>Home</i>, even though I was pretty lukewarm about it.  Given some very good books I did read that were eligible &#8212; <i>Unaccustomed Earth, Telex from Cuba</i> and, yes, <i>Netherland</i> &#8212; not too mention all the foreign-originated work that qualifies &#8212; that seems to be a disappointing choice.  Let&#8217;s hope the Pulitzer is more interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/nbcc-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1405</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?page_id=968#comment-1405</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t get a chance (well, didn&#039;t choose) to read &lt;em&gt;Home&lt;/em&gt; before tomorrow&#039;s announcement.  I have no real plan to read &lt;em&gt;Trenchmouth&lt;/em&gt; or &lt;em&gt;Olive&lt;/em&gt;, maybe even if they win.  We&#039;ll see.

At this point, I think I hope &lt;em&gt;Home&lt;/em&gt; wins, just on the strength of Robinson&#039;s other two novels.  I didn&#039;t like &lt;em&gt;Lazarus&lt;/em&gt; and I found &lt;em&gt;2666&lt;/em&gt; too convoluted.  We&#039;ll see tomorrow.

By the way, I notice on here that the last comments were about my interviewing Phillips.  Last I heard from her she still said she would, but that&#039;s been a while.  Maybe my questions were awful!  I&#039;m thinking it&#039;s mostly that she&#039;s busy and using her time for other things.  I&#039;m not sure, then, that I&#039;ll get the interview completed to post, though I can say that she is a pleasant person by email!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t get a chance (well, didn&#8217;t choose) to read <em>Home</em> before tomorrow&#8217;s announcement.  I have no real plan to read <em>Trenchmouth</em> or <em>Olive</em>, maybe even if they win.  We&#8217;ll see.</p>
<p>At this point, I think I hope <em>Home</em> wins, just on the strength of Robinson&#8217;s other two novels.  I didn&#8217;t like <em>Lazarus</em> and I found <em>2666</em> too convoluted.  We&#8217;ll see tomorrow.</p>
<p>By the way, I notice on here that the last comments were about my interviewing Phillips.  Last I heard from her she still said she would, but that&#8217;s been a while.  Maybe my questions were awful!  I&#8217;m thinking it&#8217;s mostly that she&#8217;s busy and using her time for other things.  I&#8217;m not sure, then, that I&#8217;ll get the interview completed to post, though I can say that she is a pleasant person by email!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/nbcc-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-959</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 01:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?page_id=968#comment-959</guid>
		<description>Hmmmmm.  I&#039;ll definitely have to look into this.  I wonder if she&#039;d be willing to meet.  I&#039;ll write and see what she says.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmmm.  I&#8217;ll definitely have to look into this.  I wonder if she&#8217;d be willing to meet.  I&#8217;ll write and see what she says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KevinfromCanada</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/nbcc-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-958</link>
		<dc:creator>KevinfromCanada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?page_id=968#comment-958</guid>
		<description>The publisher&#039;s bio I found says she is director of the MFA program at Rutgers-Newark, among other things, so I&#039;m kind of hoping one of your local contacts may know a thing or two about Phillips.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The publisher&#8217;s bio I found says she is director of the MFA program at Rutgers-Newark, among other things, so I&#8217;m kind of hoping one of your local contacts may know a thing or two about Phillips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://mookseandgripes.com/reviews/nbcc-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-957</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mookse.wordpress.com/?page_id=968#comment-957</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m afraid I&#039;ll have to defer to other readers on this one, Kevin.  I&#039;ve never read it or anything by Jayne Anne Phillips.  

I&#039;ll do some looking around, though.  That those three authors would endorse it has me interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m afraid I&#8217;ll have to defer to other readers on this one, Kevin.  I&#8217;ve never read it or anything by Jayne Anne Phillips.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll do some looking around, though.  That those three authors would endorse it has me interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

