We Others by Steven Millhauser (2011) Knopf (2011) 400 pp
I’ve been struggling for a while to figure out what to do for my October recommendations. Obviously October recommendations have to center around something haunting if not outright horrific — but all in a fun way. Sure, I’ve reviewed several horrific novels here, like Roberto Bolaño’s 2666 (click here for my review; my opinion of it has grown infinitely since I first read it), but not many of these quite suit the mood because their horror isn’t that fun. At this time of year one could ceratinly do worse than read César Aira’s Ghosts, (click here for my review), but that takes place on New Years Eve, and the ghosts aren’t that scary. Patrick McGrath’s Asylum (click here for my review) is closer, but I prefer his book Doctor Haggard’s Disease, which I haven’t reviewed yet. When I think Halloween horror, I think Edgar Allan Poe and the like (I love Edgar Allan Poe). With this as my standard, only two books reviewed here would work as classic “ghost” stories with intelligent angles; they are two that I recommend fully: Sarah Waters’ The Little Stranger (click here for my review) and Henry James’ great — no, magnificent — The Turn of the Screw (click here for my review). So, rather than do a recommendation list (as I have in past months — click here for monthly recommendation lists), I wanted to review what will be one of my favorite books of the year from an author who often reminds me of Edgar Allan Poe: Steven Millhauser’s new “new and selected” collection of short stories, We Others.
Actually, if I were to make a recommendation list for October (wink wink), I would have included Millhauser’s Edwin Mullhouse: The Life and Death of an American Writer 1943 – 1954, by Jeffrey Cartwright (click here for my review). In that early novel, Millhauser displays his haunting vision of youth’s mysteries, and it is beautiful and horrific, both aspects common in these short stories.
Let me start by listing the “old” stories in this collection: from In the Penny Arcade we get “A Protest Against the Sun,” “August Eschenburg,” and “Snowmen”; from The Barnum Museum we get “The Barnum Museum,” “The Eighth Voyage of Sinbad,” and “Eisenheim the Illusionist”; from The Knife Thrower, “The Knife Thrower,” “A Visit,” “Flying Carpets,” and “Claire de Lune”; and from his latest collection Dangerous Laughter, “Cat ‘n’ Mouse,” “The Disappearance of Elaine Coleman,” “History of a Disturbance,” and “The Wizard of West Orange.” I will not be reviewing any of these stories here because I have each collection and the goal to review each at some point. However, if you’re new to Millhauser, this collection, with its selection of past stories, is a great place to start.
There are seven new stories in We Others: “The Slap,” “Tales of Darkness and the Unknown, Vol. XIV: The White Glove,” “Getting Closer,” “The Invasion from Outer Space,” “People of the Book,” “The Next Thing,” and “We Others.” Each is fantastic. We’ve already looked at two of them on this blog: “The Invasion from Outer Space” was published in the February 9 & 16, 2009 issue of The New Yorker and I spoke about it briefly here; “Getting Closer” was published in this year’s January 3 issue of The New Yorker, and it is still one of my favorite stories to appear in that magazine this year; I wrote about it here.
In this post, I’d like to focus on another of his “new” stories that I read last year when it was published in the summer reading issue of Tin House. (Incidentally, another of the “new” stories, “The Next Thing,” was published in Harpers, but I didn’t read it there. Also, there was another new Millhauser story, “Phantoms,” that isn’t in this collection but that was published in issue 35 of McSweeney’s. The man’s short stories are rightfully sought after.) The story I’m focusing on here is “Tales of Darkness and the Unknown, Vol. XIV: The White Glove,” whose wonderful title takes us back to those pulp collections of scary stories — what could be better for the month of October?
This is Edgar Allan Poe, in both ability and content, born a century later. Will, the narrator, is in his senior year of high school, and his best friend is the youthful, quiet — dare I say, delicate? — Emily Hohn: “It happened quickly: one day she was that quiet girl in English class, the next we were friends.” Will and Emily just fit together. There is no real romance (though there are buds of it, and of obsession); for the most part, it’s a peaceful and reliable friendship for both, which is welcome because Will says, “I’d spent the last year so desperately in love with another girl, so whipped-up and feverish, that even my happiness had felt like unhappiness.”
The story begins in the early autumn, and Millhauser takes us through the smells and sounds of each month until the climax the next June (one of Millhauser’s great abilities is to make the feel of seasons — often from a child’s perspective — come alive again). In the interim, Will’s relationship with Emily is threatened by a white glove she suddenly and inexplicably starts wearing on one hand. Neither she nor her parents will say anything about it.
But there was something else about the glove that troubled me, beyond the sharp fact of its presence. Ever since I’d become friends with Emily, I had felt an easy flow between us, an openness, a transparency. This restful merging, this serene interwovenness, was something I had never known before, something that reminded me of her porch in sunlight, or the night of the snow shining under the streetlights. The glove was harming that flow. It was, by its very nature, an act of concealment. Emily herself, by eluding the question of her hand, by refusing to reveal whatever it was she was hiding under the white cloth, was forcing me to think about her in a secretive way. It occurred to me that the glove was changing her — turning her into a body, with privacies and evasions.
My, but that’s a fantastic passage! It sets up the contours of Will and Emily’s relationship and how the glove begins to define how Will looks at Emily. He cannot help but wonder about this glove that she never takes off. Will’s obsession grows and warps. Emily is aware of this, saddened by this, but she still does not want to let Will know, perhaps in fear that it would ruin their friendship. The story develops slowly and nicely over the year as the white glove grows in Will’s imagination, and Millhauser uses it to inject tension into other aspects of Will and Emily’s relationship:
“Look at that,” I said, and lightly touched her forearm where the dim light lay across it. She looked down at her arm, where my two fingers rested. I moved my fingers slowly down her forearm until the side of a finger touched the edge of the glove. Slowly I lifted one finger and stroked the white cloth. It was softer that I had imagined. “What are you doing,” Emily whispered. “Nothing,” I said. I began stroking the part of the glove that lay over her wrist. Emily’s right hand descended only my fingers. She lifted my hand and placed it on her collarbone. With the fingers of her right hand she unbuttoned the top button of her shirt. Then she undid the button below. I felt the sudden edge of her white bra and the skin below her collarbone; my thumb touched the small connecting strap that joined the parts of the bra. I understood, with absolute clarity, that she was offering me her breasts in place of her hand. An immense pity came over me, for Emily Hohn, for the two of us sitting there like sad children, for the dark room and the spring rain, before anger seized me.
It’s a tremendous story, creepy, nuanced, filled with those haunting obsessions we try to repress but that explode into all sorts of ugliness. The entire collection — Millhauser’s entire ouvre — is worth reading. I chose to focus on “The White Glove” here mainly because the title easily ushers in the month of October, but each story has its own disturbances that suit the month well. Happy October!
[…] about Millhauser’s latest collection of new and selected stories, We Others (my review here), a few of the reviews lamented that the title story in The King in the Tree (2003) wasn’t […]
[…] only one I’ve read is We Others, and I fully endorse it (my review here). I’m happy to see two of the finalists are short story collections. Share […]
[…] We Others, by Steven Millhauser (my review here) […]
[…] Steven Millhauser for We Others: New and Selected Stories (my review here) […]
Having recently read Millhauser’s new collection Disruptions, and waiting for discussion of it to open up here, I’ve been inspired to reread some stories from past collections. One such is “The Slap”, the first in We Others, and not covered here. I’ve little to say, though, and little need, seems to me. But I may be wrong, so I’d be interested if anyone else comments..
–>Spoiler Alert–>
Reading it this evening, I kept falling asleep and it was all I could do to finish it. I did, though, because I had forgotten just how it ended. It went on and on, slap after slap. Untypically, Millhauser explained ad nauseam about everything that may have made for discussion here, and much that required no explanstion.
And, oh yeah, now I remember: lt did end, and he posed for us lingering questions and some possible answers. We can speculate, but it seems there’s really no clue.
Am I wrong?
I’ve now reread all the “New” stories in the collection We Others. I don’t know how many I’ll comment on, but I’ll continue with the 2nd, “The White Glove”. First a few added words about “The Slap” (my original comment above).
I recall that when I first read this collection years ago, I liked “”The Slap” a lot better than this time. I think that is because the premise of the story was new and intrigued me. Rereading, the over-explanatory manner of writing bored me because I already knew the story. I suppose I had forgotten exactly how it ended because it was a mere mystery that didn’t provoke speculation beyond what the author spelled out.
So why did I enjoy rereading “The White Glove” so much more and feel the story was so much better? To start with, I think the first person (Will) made it more personal and engaged me more. Although technically “The Slap” was first person, the narrator (we) represented the town. In “The White Glove”, while the mystery was solved, the outcome left to our imagination, with intriguing clues.
—>Spoiler Alert—>
Did Will decide that Emily was and would be happier without him and permanently withdraw his friendship? Did he feel that would be best for him, too? What other outcome might have been? I tend to think Millhauser was wise to leave the story unfinished.
I want to comment at least briefly about the new stories in this volume which haven’t been discussed above. Trevor wrote a great commentary on “The White Glove”, and I added my 2¢. I also briefly offered my rather disparaging response to “The Slap”, which others have a better opinion of, And I agree it has more substance than I suggested; it was primarily the style and presentation that bothered me. So I hope someone will counter with a better take.
Trevor wrote a brief description of “Invasion From Outer Space” in his list of 2009 New Yorker stories (it’s Feb 9 & 16), linked above and under the title in the author index. The story is a great little piece of sci-fi, describing an invasion of an unexpected sort. It’s no spoiler to say it’s not a spaceship with aliens, and no “War of the Worlds”. What Millhauser imagines is not at first too scary, but is really more so because, it seems to me, something of that sort is altogether plausible. The story is available on the New Yorker site if you have a subscription.
“Getting Closer” is a small masterpiece about a boy and his family at a public beach. They’ve been here before and he’s been intensely looking forward to this year’s visit. His anticipation continues even after they arrive … You just need to read this short piece if you haven’t. It would be unfair for me to tell more. The story is discussed extensively under its title–but please read the story before you read that discussion! It’s on the New Yorker site. I may later add some comments to the main discussion.
“People of the Book” reminds me (in a way) of a New Twilight Zone episode (1980s?). As I recall, a group of adults were at desks in a school classroom, being addressed by a smiling man who spoke to them about what was to be their “new lives”, as if he were telling them about a fun field trip. These adult “kids” (I’ll call them) were utterly innocent, with not a hint of a notion that there was anything unusual or objectionable about being told their old lives were now over, and what their new lives will be like. Anyone remember that?
The narrator in “People of the Book” is wholly different from that smiling “teacher”. Rather, this voice is oppressive and suppressive, as if the people he’s addressing need to be held firmly and made to feel there is no way out of the reality being delivered. In the Zone episode, there was no need to project any such message, as any inclination to assert individual choice had obviously been rooted out as if it had never existed. Which is more disturbing? (Slash the ?)
I read “The Next Thing” long before I got around to Martin Dressler (Millhauser’s Pulitzer novel), so I was quite impressed with the newer story–still am, but it does have a lot in common with the descriptions of Dressler’s final extravaganza. Had I read that first, I may have felt the new story was essentially a rerun, at least stylistically. However, it does offer a different and ominous picture, and a uniquely relevant message. There’s no substitute for reading it.
Fanciful as the story is, it parallels the expansion and evolution of super shopping malls, and essentially what Walmart might like to do if it could: take over and become *the shopping place. When Walmart came to our nearby under-15,000 population city, it put many existing stores out of business, leaving numerous store spaces empty, some still so after many years.
For those of you who, like me, find both Walmart and Amazon to be undesirable monstrosities, here’s an inspiration from me: I’m happy to report that I’ve never bought anything from Walmart, nor through Amazon. Yes, it is possible to live without supporting either one! Try it! Urge others! Let’s not risk “The New Thing”.
The link above to Trevor’s review of the title story “We Others” seems to be obsolete. I reread this very long ghost story because I wanted to discover what I may have missed when I was left unimpressed the first time. It follows (in first person) the invisible (mostly), rather neurotic afterlife of the main character. He hides out in attics and “haunts” two women in their home–no intent to scare them. There’s *something to this story. Not a favorite of mine, though. Maybe it’s a quintessential ghost story, I don’t know, I haven’t read many. Someone tell me.
The collection We Others is apparently the most read of Millhauser’s story collections. It annoys me that it combines a few new stories with a small “selected stories”. There were more than enough great stories in his previous original collections to make a full sized “Selected Stories”. If he didn’t have enough new stories for a full new collection, he might better have waited until he did. For me, this collection comes across as a commercial ploy. Maybe it worked. Ideally it should lead readers to his other collections, not be regarded as *the Millhauser collection to read. I imagine it did some of each.