“Making Conversation”
by William Trevor
from Last Stories
I have been putting off reading my final two stories from William Trevor’s final collection, Last Stories, because I cannot stand the thought of finishing this book. At the same time, I have a lot more of his work to get to, so it is time to carry on.
“Making Conversation” showed up in Electric Lit with an introduction by Patrick Cox, Trevor’s son (see here; this link also has the story in its entirety). Cox mentions that Trevor was working on this story in the mid-1990s and touches on the latent violence in the story. To be honest, it took me a while to understand just what Cox was talking about because the story doesn’t seem to contain any overt violence. Ah, but Cox doesn’t mean overt violence. He means the threat that results in a wound, the suggestion that results in pain.
The story is structured in a straightforward manner. When it begins, Olivia, a thirty-seven-year-old woman who is separated from her husband, answers her doorbell. Annoyed, because it’s a Sunday afternoon and she and “the man Olivia lives with” are watching The Return of the Thin Man (a movie that, to my knowledge, doesn’t exist; I’m not sure if it is relevant, or if Trevor was just thinking of any one of the five sequels to The Thin Man). Olivia is surprised in her annoyance to hear a woman from two flights down, after commenting on not being very good at “these gadgets,” ask, “Is my husband there?” Olivia denies any such thing; the reader thinks about the nameless “man Olivia lives with”; the woman is insistent and finally tells Olivia that she is Mrs. Vinnicombe.
That’s the end of the first section. From there we shift immediately to this: “Olivia met Vinnicombe on the street.” Of course this further undercuts Olivia’s denial. Not only is there a man with Olivia, but Olivia does have some relationship with the woman’s husband.
The story proceeds to go back and forth. Olivia eventually invites the woman upstairs (the man retreats to the bathtub). While Olivia listens to Mrs. Vinnicombe, we go back in time to the various encounters Olivia had with her husband. At first he seemed like a mild gentleman, kind and concerned when Olivia stumbles down two steps and falls onto a sidewalk as he walks by. She is at the time grateful of his kindness and moves on quickly with her life, barely remembering him. However, his kind solicitude finds its way back into her life, quickly raising alarms.
Here we have, then, in “Making Conversation,” Olivia meeting with her stalker’s wife. Olivia is not a stranger to pain, and she recognizes it in Mrs. Vinnicombe, who, we see, has been fully debriefed by her husband, albeit from his warped perspective.
‘My hope was he’d be here.’
‘Your hope?’
‘He only wanted to be with you. No bones about it: he said he couldn’t lie. A meaning in his life. He used those words.’
Mrs. Vinnicombe is talkative now. Her unease has dissipated; fingers twisting into one another a moment ago are still.
‘He never made me think you were a go-getting woman. I never thought of you as that. “Don’t blame her,” he said, no more than two days ago, but then he’d said it already. When he told me was the time he said it first, and often after that.’ Her voice is flat, empty of emotion. She says she’s frightened. She says again her hope had been to find her husband here.
He disappeared the day before. What’s she to think?
For Olivia’s part, already sitting across from a woman in pain, how does she extricate herself from a situation not of her making, one where the real story — that Mrs. Vinnicombe’s husband is a stalker — shows the woman in pain that her husband is horrific and pathetic in ways she didn’t believe before. But Olivia is seeing other things still. Though not encouraging an affair, she did allow Mr. Vinnicombe to take her to dinner. She pitied him, she thinks. But look how this paragraph ends:
‘Your husband and I were not having any kind of love affair.’ She gave him no encouragement, Olivia says: not once has she done that. She doesn’t say she pitied him after he followed her from the Tube station, the night they sat together on the red-upholstered banquette, the night she asked him if he had always invented thing. These details, now, seem neither here nor there: omitting to relate them is not intended to mislead. ‘Why don’t we have a bite to eat?’ he said and, still pitying, she allowed him to take her to a place he knew nearby, called the Chunky Chicken Platter. ‘All right for you?’ he solicitously enquired when they were given a table there, and it was then that she knew she was pitying herself as well.
Oh, it’s heart-wrenching stuff. Olivia recognizes pain and jealousy and even inappropriate expressions of lust. It doesn’t change the situation, but she can see it, and the story ends with her deep reflection. She thinks the Vinnicombes will probably reconcile soon. Perhaps Vinnicombe’s disappearance is his way of excising his hopeless love and suffocating the pain. But even if that happens, Olivia, never having done anything wrong, will be a dull pain in their lives.
And I love the final line, where we see just how pathetic it is but how real the pain will be:
Courage could have brushed glamour over what little there was, but courage is ridiculous when the other person doesn’t want to know.
This fake romance he built in his head, where he felt overcome to the point of leaving and, Olivia thinks, perhaps even imagined “his last thoughts reaching out towards his hopeless love, that he imagined the seaweed in his clothes, and sand beneath his eyelids and in his mouth.” It’s a suicide that would be meaningless, ridiculous even. Let’s hope Olivia’s right that Mr. Vinnicombe didn’t attempt such a gesture, but instead returns home and finds something to fix.
I always love how quietly Trevor can convey this torrential pain. If you read the story quickly, it’s a pretty simple conversation between to women about a disturbing misunderstanding. But there is much underneath that conversation.
Every sentence he writes is invested with feeling, conveyed with such quiet subtlety. I still have so many of the Complete Stories (the one published before this volume) to finish, I can only look forward to this one. Great to partake in your enthusiasm, Trevor
It has been a while since I read this story. What I remember right away most clearly was being fascinated with the structure and idea of the story and wondering how the idea for it came to him. There is both an intricate complexity to the various relationships among the characters yet somehow a simple elegance in how the story plays out. The missing husband is, in some ways, the most obvious character to make the central one and his wife the second most obvious, so it is particularly interesting to invert that and have the other woman, who has to deal with them both, the greater focus. I am reminded of hearing Joe Jackson explain his song “The Bridge” from his album Heaven & Hell. The theme of the album was songs about the seven deadly sins and this one was about envy. The song is sung from the point of view of a woman speaking to her sister who is envious of her. By looking at it from the side of the one envied and the difficulty of dealing with being envied, it presents a different perspective on the issue. Trevor seems to me to do the same sort of thing here. And as hard as it is to deal with a man who has become fixated on her, having to figure out how to deal with his wife when she shows up on her doorstep is one step more inventive. It’s a great story.
I love your insights, David. I hadn’t thought of the unique perspective we are getting here: from the one who is desired and envied. I’ve got just one more story left in this collection, and I think I’ll end up posting on it in a week or two. Then what?!
Thanks Trevor. As for you “then what?” I’d say that’s a good question. I just started Samanta Schweblin’s Mouthful of Birds today. I also plan soon to read through 9 of the 10 plays of August Wilson’s Pittsburgh Cycle (Gem of the Ocean is the hard one to find, which is a shame because it is chronologically the first one) and when we get to August (on the 20th, to be precise) I will start reading Uwe Johnson’s Anniversaries one diary entry per day, so those are my bigger reading projects for now. Oh yeah, and I still have a few more of Deborah Eisenberg’s stories to finish to get through her Collected Stories (which comprises four books of her stories). I doubt you will have to look hard to find a new project. I’m sure some project will come find you
You’re right that the project will find me. There are some I’ve . . . abandoned is not the right word . . . some I’ve not finished over the years. I had been going through Sherwood Anderson’s Winesburg Ohio for the blog, and I might try to start that up again. I love those stories, and I haven’t been in them since I took a trip away from Winesburg.
Also, I might do Anniversaries again as you are. I’m anxious to read it again, and I think that’s the perfect way to embark on a re-read. I wonder if there’s a good way to make that a project with some handy resources for folks looking to get insights from each other as well as have a place to congregate and get encouragement. The daily nature makes it different from what I usually do here. I’m putting my thinking cap on.
I have been trying to think what I might do to go along with reading Anniversaries. I had the idea of keeping my own daily journal where I write something fairly brief (perhaps just a simple paragraph) about each entry, but that might be both too much and too demanding to come up with something worth saying every day, even if just for myself. What you might want to try is thinking about something that might be weekly. August 20th is a Tuesday (my start date is August 20th even though the first dated entry is the 21st because there is a little bit that comes before the first dated entry) so Mondays would be the end of a week. You could do something once per week on each Monday. But that’s also New Yorker new story day so maybe moving this back a day to each Sunday might work. I don’t know. There are a few months left to sort it out before August rolls around.