The Clown
by Heinrich Böll (Ansichten eines Clowns, 1963)
translated from the German by Leila Vennewitz (2010)
Melville House (2010)
248 pp

Melville House is publishing “The Essential Heinrich Böll” over the next year. This month they have published The Safety Net, Billiards at Half-Past Nine, and The Clown. In April, we will see The Train Was on Time, Irish Journal, and Group Portrait with Lady; next January they will be bringing out the final two volumes: What’s to Become of the Boy? Or: Something to Do with Books — A Memoir and The Collected Stories of Heinrich Böll.

This was my first experience with Böll. I had no idea whether his prose was dense and daunting, though that was certainly my preconception. I was surprised (and relieved, honestly — I wasn’t in the mood for obfuscation when I opened the book), then, to find the prose smooth and fluid and highly readable. The substance is still layered and folded, making much of this fine reading.

The Clown is Hans Schnier, our narrator:

What I do best are the absurdities of daily life: I observe, add up these observations, increase them to the nth degree and draw the square root from them, but with a different factor from the one I increased them by.

Hans is in his late twenties, and, despite his relatively substantial success for a professional clown, his parents still don’t consider him gainfully employed. When the book begins, Hans narrates his fall from grace; the style of the narration shows very clearly that he is distracted, depressed, and demotivated. Marie, the girl he has been living with “in sin” for several years, has been struck with guilt and has left him to marry a Catholic man in the Catholic church (“I must take the path that I must take.”). Hans comes from a Protestant family, but he has never been religious. Here is a great passage that shows how well Böll packs all of this information into a moody first-person narration:

I am not religious myself, I don’t even go to church, and I make use of the sacred texts and songs for therapeutic purposes: they help me more than anything else to overcome the two afflictions Nature has saddled me with: depression and headaches.  Since Marie went over to the Catholics (although Marie is a Catholic herself I feel this phrase is appropriate), the intensity of these two complaints has increased, and even the Tantum Ergoor the Litany of Loreto — till no my favorite remedies for pain — are not much use any more. There is one temporarily effective remedy: alcohol; there could be a permanent cure: Marie. Marie has left me. A clown who takes to drink falls faster than a drunk tile-layer topples off a roof.

Besides suffering from depression, Hans also suffers from an inclination toward monogamy, which he describes as an affliction though something deeply embedded in his nature. Hans is completely lost without Marie; he has never wanted and still does not want anyone else. Not being religious but believing in monogamy, Hans rages that Marie will be committing adultery is she marries someone else, even though her Catholic friends keep insisting that by marrying someone else she will actually become pure. The conflict between unity (as portrayed in this relationship) being torn apart by social mores is central to the novel and was certainly the most interesting aspect for me.

The structure of the novel is interesting. Mostly, we are with Hans for only one day. He has returned to Bonn, his hometown, after his dependence on alcohol made him fall, literally; during a particularly clumsy performance which lacked the subtle movements that made him an artist, he fell, twisted his knew, and didn’t get up. The stage manager cancles all upcoming performances and refuses to pay full price for this one. His agent cannot secure another booking and is, frankly, getting tired of dealing with Hans anyway; where his agent could once book a nightly performance at a substantial price (and a substantial commission), Hans is now threatening to rely on the pennies thrown at him for performing in the street. Through all of this, Hans remains apathetic; performing on the street would, apparently, be just fine. Mainly, he wants more to drink:

I would have given my shirt for a drink, and only the thought of the complicated negotiations involved in such an exchange discouraged me from undertaking this transaction. 

So the book picks up in Bonn, after Hans has returned. Through the remainder of the day, Hans makes a series of phone calls to and is visited by some family, friends, and enemies. He doesn’t necessarily want to speak to any of them — unless they can help him speak to Marie; mainly, he hopes some of them will give him a bit of money. His parents, after all, are millionaires.

As these interactions take place, we get a substantial back-story to the relationships and to Hans’ bitterness (it is no surprise to see that Hans has often been compared to Holden Caulfield). For example, we learn that during World War II, when Hans was just barely an adolescent, his mother bought into and supported the new regime and all of the atrocities it committed: “You do see, don’t you, that everyone must do his bit to drive the Jewish Yankees from our sacred German soil.” This ardent national spirit led her to send her older daughter, Henrietta, into service at age seventeen. Henrietta died, and one of Hans’ bitterest memories is of her departure. Now, his mother has a different tone, and Hans derides her as a hypocrite.

Meanwhile for years my mother has been president of the Executive Committee of the Societies for the Reconciliation of Racial Differences; she goes to the Anne Frank House in Amsterdam, sometimes even to America, and lectures to American women’s clubs about the remorse of German youth, still in the same gentle, mild voice she probably used when saying goodbye to Henrieta.

When Hans speaks to her on the phone, he lets his hatred show. Here’s what he says when she answers: “‘I am a delegate of the Executive Committee of Jewish Yankees, just passing through — may I please speak to your daughter?’ I even startled myself.” He also startled me.

The personal relationships and the conflicts portrayed are what made this book delightful for me. However, it wasn’t all delight. I’m not versed in the larger social conflicts Böll is addressing here. I’m not familiar with the role of the Catholic church in post-War Germany, and I’m not familiar with the criticisms against it. I also got the distinct impression that this was not speaking about Germany generally but about this particular region of Germany. When Hans goes into the politics and social constructs of this region, I was lost and the book seemed to drag on. Surely it would be more interesting if I were better educated on these matters, but, coming at it as a general reader, these longueurs were difficult to get through.

Thankfully the book is filled with intimate relationships between people, and those I do understand. Böll’s mixture of depression and wit — “There’s nothing more depressing for people than a clown they feel sorry for. It’s like a waiter coming up in a wheelchair to bring you your beer.” — also filled this book with life. Overall, a good read, and I’m anxious to see what the other Essential Bölls are like.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Mookse and the Gripes on Patreon!
By |2016-06-27T17:26:56-04:00January 22nd, 2011|Categories: Book Reviews, Heinrich Böll|Tags: , , , |7 Comments


  1. stujallen January 22, 2011 at 2:15 pm

    I reviewed his billiards at half nine the other day ,I read this many years ago ,it has the usual Boll traits ,catholic church ,guilt and post war germanys struggles to find a new identity ,lovely review ,missed these reissues ,was be moaning in my review how few the local library had may buy one of these ,all the best stu

  2. Trevor January 22, 2011 at 4:06 pm

    They are nice reissues, Stu. Melville House’s design is, in my opinion, getting better, with these underplayed covers part of the showcase.

  3. Lisa Hill January 22, 2011 at 9:48 pm

    I think it’s wonderful that the digital age is bringing us these Nobel Prize winners that have never made it onto the shelves in my local book shops.

  4. Anton Baer January 26, 2011 at 6:35 am

    And Where Were You, Adam? isn’t mentioned here. I recommend it as the most powerful of all Boell’s novels, which isn’t that unusual as it was his first and came just before The Train Was On Time (which I thought had unfortunate imitations of Borchert.) You needn’t be versed in the intricacies of post-war German Catholicism, or even the Catholicism of Alec Guiness, which Boell refers to in The Clown, to grasp the beautiful simplicity of And Where Were You, Adam? While all the eleven linked stories that make up the novella are intense, gripping and moving, the chapter detailing the quiet, calm, methodical building and subsequent quiet, calm, methodical blasting of a bridge across a river in eastern Slovakia is especially striking for its portrayal of the eerily sane destruction of the war. What captures the book best, maybe, is one of the two forewords to the novella, the simple few lines taken from Theodor Haecker’s Tag und Nachtbuecher: ‘A world catastrophe can serve many purposes. One is to furnish an alibi when God asks: ‘And where were you, Adam?’ ‘I was in the war.’

  5. Trevor January 26, 2011 at 2:01 pm

    Thanks Anton. You mention that And Where Were You, Adam? is a collection of linked short stories, so I wonder if it will be part of the collected stories due out next year. After your comment, I hope so.

  6. Anton Baer January 28, 2011 at 5:55 am

    Trevor, they are not short stories in the sense that each, in the book, has a title of its own or could be republished in a group of other stories. The chapters are in an ordered sequence that follows a very small and receding part of the German army on its retreat through Hungary, with an excursion north into what is now Slovakia (the bridge chapter), and a final chapter in Germany. The main character is a young soldier, Feinhals, who is borne along somewhat passively, but the other characters that dominate other chapters are all stamped with intense individuality. None of them really interact with Feinhals to make up a ‘plot’, far less push it along; there is no real plot other than the retreat, which has its own fatalistic dynamic that draws them all in, drags them all along. There’s even a little orderly dragging along a suitcase full of champagne. There is a woman too, of course, a Hungarian Jewish woman with a beautiful voice, and there is the German choirmaster in the forest camp who kills her; and on the story goes, with a weary tramp of boots, the smell of overipe apricots, under the summer sun of Hungary… I think critics looking for a plot and a Bildungsroman were looking for the wrong things in the wrong place. And unlike Boell’s later work, it’s not easy to snip out of it classroom lectures on German post-war guilt. There’s no ‘post-war’ in it. Would that explain its neglect?

    It was the first book by Boell I ever read and I think it was his finest, all the way through. I loved the Clown as well, but there were many parts of it that didn’t quite stick to reality, like Hans’ ability to smell odours through the telephone. (A bit of Grass in there, perhaps.)… If it were republished, in the original translation by L.V., I would buy ten copies and give them away at Christmas.

  7. Trevor January 29, 2011 at 10:18 pm

    I’m not sure if that would explain the neglect, Anton. I will ask Melville House and let you know what they say (if they answer). you’ve got me interested in the book!

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.